Argument or view Kant’s Deontology posits that the best way to act morally to act from duty with the consideration of the highest good, that is, a good without condition which is intrinsically good by itself (Kant, 1780). He formulated his deontological ethics in a categorical imperative of doing good for the sake of good regardless of its consequence (Kant, 1785). Explication of argument To effectively argue that Kantian Deontology is the correct moral theory, it would be necessary to explain the formulation that executes Kant’s deontology which is categorical imperative. According to Kant, imperatives imply what they meant which are command such as “wake up early”. Often they are hypothetical imperative because they only serve a specific objective or purpose such as “wake up early so you will not be later for work. This imperative or command becomes categorical when it is applied universally and that the actions and decisions of individuals are to be judged solely by their motivations and that the consequences do not matter morally (as in the case of hypothetical imperative) neither the intended consequences nor the actual consequences matter morally; only the principle or rule we follow if we do the action matters morally. In simpler terms, this meant doing what is good regardless of consequence and that by doing is an end by itself. Thus, actions themselves become an end and this action should be a rational result in the exercise of freewill Consistent to this, Kant’s categorical imperative states that every person has the duty to use and exercise his goodness/humanity as a means to an end. The application of Kant’s categorical imperative is best illustrated in slave ownership. A slave owner may assert his right to own a property which in this case is a slave. While ownership by itself is not immoral, slave ownership becomes unethical or immoral according to Kant’s categorical imperative because it deprives a person of his free rational action and that persons can never be a mere means to an end (Johnson, 2012). One distinct characteristic of Kant’s categorical imperative is that it is universal and inflexible that it applies to everyone without exception. For Kant, neither good nor bad luck affects in assessing the moral act of a person. His idea of “goodwill” did not become good because it serves an end or objective but because it intends to do “good” regardless of the consequence. Objection The best objection to Kant’s deontological ethics as formulated by categorical imperative is Thomas Nagel’s argument about moral luck. Unlike Kant, Thomas Nagel makes an exception through his assertion of moral luck that there are a broad range of externalities that affects moral judgment. Moral luck occurs when “an agent can be correctly treated as an object of moral judgment despite the fact that a significant aspect of what she is assessed for depends on factors beyond her control” (Nelkin, 2013). It meant that we should only be assessed morally only to the extent that the factors attendant to the circumstances of our actions that we can control as stated in his “control principle”. This argument also hold sway because it consider the realities and externalities of which an action must be carried out and therefore, an act is best judged by considering its environment. Unlike Kant who is bent on stringent rules that we should do good all the time regardless of circumstances, Nagel’
An argument that Kantian Deontology is the correct moral theory Name Teacher Class University Date Introduction The issue of ethics particularly in determining which of its many principles is applicable as a best guide in a real world setting can indeed be murky…
Moreover, if God made a decision of revering Himself to the world in order to attest to his existence, there would be no need for faith (Adamson, 2013). This paper focuses on drawing necessary ideas from literatures in order to support the notion that indeed God does exist.
Reconstruction era fell under the leadership of Abraham Lincoln, and his successor Andrew Johnson. From the literal definition of reconstruction, this period involved re-structuring and re-formulation of state policies that would reflect prevailing interests of the society at that time.
The merger in focus is the biggest deal in the national telecommunication history; that happened in 2005 between AT&T and SBC. Concern of Customer Advocates over the merger On the month of November, 2005, SBC communications announced the acquisition of AT&T.
Some of them were really hard for me to understand. Some of them were pretty controversial. But I had been able to understand all those theories, al least memorize them if I didn’t understood. Made sense out of them. But today I looked at them from a very
The scenario can be best described in the following quote “…much of the proceeds of drug trafficking, human smuggling, and other criminal activities, which are often settled in cash, are not included in these
The laws include imprisoning, arresting the law violators, confiscating the property of offenders who are convicted, imposing travel restrictions on offenders and conducting household searches for members
In most cases, the government tries to control these interests’ rates in order to spur economic growth owing to the impact that these rates have on business activities, investments, as well as developments. As such, it is imperative to note that
4 pages (1000 words)Term Paper
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com