You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Name Teacher Class Date Discuss Kant’s deontological ethics in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. First, explain the three propositions that Kant gives in Section I concerning the moral determination of the will. Next, explain how Kant distinguishes between a hypothetical imperative and a categorical imperative.
Kant’s Deontology posits that the best way to act morally to act from duty with the consideration of the highest good, that is, acting through the moral determination of the will. Kant’s acting through the moral determination of will meant that the motivation of one’s action must be pursue the good without condition which is intrinsically good by itself (Kant 30). He formulated his deontological ethics in a categorical imperative of doing good for the sake of good regardless of its consequence (Kant’s Ethics). The three propositions of moral determination of the will are as follows; a. Universal Law formulation - "Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law (Kant 30) ". This means that if one is to act good, that will should not be subjected to any condition or any physical constraints. b. Humanity or End in Itself formulation - "Act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end” (Kant 30). This meant the free will is a source of rational action. ...
Not exactly what you need?