Controversies over the laws which are basically designed for protecting people from dangerous behavior are problems of paternalism. Paternalism is interference in people’s freedom though it is for their own good. It is like a father making decisions for his kids instead of letting the kids make decisions for them, considering one important thing that father knows best. Wide range and variety of laws, practices and actions are taken into account which is under the principles of paternalism. More like a doctor or physician deciding what is best for his patients and the laws which are designed to restrict the use of cocaine, marijuana, heroin and other drugs. Such plans also include compulsory retirement plans, mandatory seatbelt laws which are designed to protect one’s interest whether they are liked by the people or people detest them. All these paternalistic practices are common, but the question is whether these practices are morally accepted or not. There is conflict of two important values attached with paternalism which include the value is taken into account for protecting and also promoting well being of others, along with the value which is associated with the freedom of persons which make their lead their life according to their wish and choice. When the people are ready to act in certain ways oppose to their own well being and security , an important question arises that are the laws justified which interfere in people’s private choices and matters. This is what leads to the problem of paternalism. There is a majority who would agree that paternalism becomes a justified thing when it is about a person who has limited and also impaired freedom of choices whether the cause of this is limited cognitive capacities or even the ignorance of facts, effects of a disease, influence of drugs and another reason can be due to coercion. Paternalism varies depending on the person, their emotional stability and behavior along with the capacity to understand and know what is best for them. According to many moral philosophers, a competent and a knowledgeable person should be allowed to make decisions freely and they should not be over ridden, though they are for their own person’s good. There was a case voiced by John Stuart Mill who was a British philosopher during the nineteenth century, according to him the only reason due to implement and make laws for the citizens and people of civilized community is to prevent problems and harm to others. Will of one’s own being is not enough physically and even morally. The laws are made for a collective society and laws which are beneficial and important for protecting the society over all. According to Mill, it was important to provide freedom as it is important and crucial for people’s individual personality development. Along with that people should be given a free hand for making choices they wish and like even if the choices are not the best ones. All these individual choices creates ability for people to make decisions and their decision making power will only improve their practices and experiences. Another important view which he holds was that individuals are the best judge for
There were various protests in Los Angeles due to the law passed by the California court according to which all the motorcyclists are suppose to wear helmets. Bikers wanted this law to be changed as they wanted freedom of choice, people who wants to wear it can wear it and people who are not interested in wearing them, will not wear it…
Many people consider this practice to be against all ethics. This is despite whether compassion was the motive or otherwise. There are many dynamics that are involved when a person requires it to alleviate extreme pain or a condition that is considered to be torture towards the person experiencing it.
Apart from universally recognized pros and cons for legally permitting abortion, there are also localized cultural sensibilities to contend with. For example, regions of the country with a large religious demographic tend to oppose abortion even when it is practically unreasonable.
During the time of the genocide, President Clinton received orders to engage the situation, but failed, because he needed to gain the support of the government and other important staffs in his government, before he could engage the situation (Stanley). President Clinton and his staff’s refusal to act could be traced to the fears of the administration, because they compared the case of Rwanda with that of Somalia.
The history of the utilization of race in the admission policies of universities in the United States has been present since the time of President John F. Kennedy. The promotion of the admission of ethnic minority groups as well as blacks started during the years following 1960 and many important figures in the United States promoted their admissions.
Roe vs. Wade (1973) ("Roe v. Wade", wikipedia.org) legalized abortion in America, and ever since two apparently irreconcilable forces have arisen. The first, pro-life (or anti-choice according to their enemies) see, at their most extreme, any abortion as tantamount to murder (www.nrlc.org), while the pro-choice (or pro-abortion according to their enemies) see, at their most extreme any abortion (even the of the so-called 'partial birth type) as morally acceptable.
Many people around us will oppose this position on the grounds of considering us rebels, but men and women like Thoreau, Emerson, Helen Keller, Therese of Calcutta, Lincoln, Anais Nin, Whitman, Napoleon Hill, Churchill, Simone de Beauvoir, Edison, Einstein, Mohammed, Buddha, and Jesus traveled their own paths and opened new ones.
These statistics are not directly related to accidents caused due to non-compliance of seat belt laws. It is generally believed that wearing seat belts is the easiest way of reducing injuries and deaths occurrences but research suggests
Although fatality rates in other areas have been declining, motorcycle fatalities are on the rise, and 2005 was actually the eighth year in a row when the motorcycle fatalities increased. There was a 13% increase in
One of the important causes of road casualities is lack of seat belt wearing. Too many people are still ignoring the warning and if drivers and passengers adhered to the seat belt policy approximately 300 lives could be saved every year in the United
ation was useful in keeping the audience attentive and captivated throughout the speech especially considering the nice graphics and transition elements that were included.
When I began presenting my speech, I felt jittery. However, I recovered within a short time and learnt to
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com