You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Are laws that protect us from our own dangerous behaviors (such seat belt or helmet) morally acceptable?
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Name: Instructor’s Name: Course: Date of Submission: There were various protests in Los Angeles due to the law passed by the California court according to which all the motorcyclists are suppose to wear helmets. Bikers wanted this law to be changed as they wanted freedom of choice, people who wants to wear it can wear it and people who are not interested in wearing them, will not wear it.
Controversies over the laws which are basically designed for protecting people from dangerous behavior are problems of paternalism. Paternalism is interference in people’s freedom though it is for their own good. It is like a father making decisions for his kids instead of letting the kids make decisions for them, considering one important thing that father knows best. Wide range and variety of laws, practices and actions are taken into account which is under the principles of paternalism. More like a doctor or physician deciding what is best for his patients and the laws which are designed to restrict the use of cocaine, marijuana, heroin and other drugs. Such plans also include compulsory retirement plans, mandatory seatbelt laws which are designed to protect one’s interest whether they are liked by the people or people detest them. All these paternalistic practices are common, but the question is whether these practices are morally accepted or not. ...
Not exactly what you need?