Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism?

Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism? Assignment example
Undergraduate
Assignment
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Name of Student Name of Professor Subject 16 May 2012 Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism? During the early times, philosophers were so intrigued with the patterns they observe in people and society thereby causing them to come up with reasoning that explained their interpretations or personal view of the existing systems…

Introduction

Thomas Hobbes believed that the best way to live life is through an absolute sovereignty in the form of a government (“Thomas Hobbes”). Having different beliefs on methods of how life must be lived, both of them thought that these methods serve the self-interest of individuals. Their philosophies therefore summarize that of a moral egoist which states that it is ethical to do actions that serve an individual’s self-interest or the common interest of a group. It is the objective of this paper to justify the lumping of these two thinkers as moral egoists in accordance to their common belief that actions must be done towards the achievement of self or group interests, and in accordance to their varying methods on how this is to be achieved. The moral egoism in Epicurus’ philosophy is better expressed in his quotes “We must then meditate on the things that make our happiness, seeing that when that is with us we have all, but when it is absent we do all to win it...” (Epicurus 84). In another statement he further emphasized “For we recognize pleasure as the first good innate in us, and from pleasure we begin every act of choice or avoidance, and to pleasure we return again, using the feeling as the standard...” (85). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Epicurus' View On Death
Epicurus used to be one of the most popular philosophers, whose contribution to the meaning of death was persistently disregarded. According to Epicurus, death is neither pleasant nor painful; therefore, based on this premise, death cannot be bad. Simultaneously, the difficulty interpreting the meaning of badness should not be dismissed and, despite its value, Epicurus’ view cannot guarantee…
The Philosophy of Epicurus
By reasoning inductively, he says that since both the young and the old can seek wisdom and since everyone is either young or old, everyone is capable of seeking wisdom. Also in another way, we can infer that Epicurus believes everyone to be capable of seeking wisdom. Indeed he advises people, either young or old, to study philosophy, because he believes that they are capable to seeking wisdom by…
The Virtue of Pleasure: Epicurus
According to the postulates of Epicurus, in the life of any human being, the only chief good in life is the pleasure that individuals attain from various thoughts, actions and experiences. It is thus in the virtue of individual pleasure that Epicurus advises people to ensure that they attain maximum enjoyment in life by achieving the most pleasurable moments and experiences. The living process…
Kant and Hobbes Comparison
Both philosophers believe in pragmatism and ethics. But Kant’s practical philosophy is concerned with the unwritten rules that govern human action while Hobbes believes that human actions are directed towards self-interest based on ethical egoism. With this, Hobbes argues that since humans tend to do things based on their self-interest, conflicts may arise when the interest of one overlaps with…
Social Contraction vs. Ethical Egoism
This theory also holds that it is alright to be this way; it is rational. However, in the real world, if everybody blindly followed their hearts desires then there would be chaos. To this situation, this theory calls for application of rationality from a different angle. This angle prescribes that people should cooperate with one another and cut down on the purely self serving pursuits. This…
Epicurus Paper
As a result, these good and bad aspects in life are what contribute to pleasure and pain respectively. Epicurus went ahead to describe what exactly pain and please were in his understanding. He mentioned that a person may decide to choose between pain and pleasure. As a result, if an individual selects pleasure over pain in their lives, then they are prone to endure only the pleasurable things in…
Philosophies of leadership
Most viewers during that time talked about the state of Mississippi as the most racially segregated and violent state in the US. These two aspects of racial segregation and prejudiced violence are clearly prevalent in the movie Woodstock. Philosophy of Nonviolence Leaders of the Civil Rights Movement came up with an idea of nonviolence as a weapon to destroy institutionalized racial segregation,…