Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism? - Assignment Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism?

Thomas Hobbes believed that the best way to live life is through an absolute sovereignty in the form of a government (“Thomas Hobbes”). Having different beliefs on methods of how life must be lived, both of them thought that these methods serve the self-interest of individuals. Their philosophies therefore summarize that of a moral egoist which states that it is ethical to do actions that serve an individual’s self-interest or the common interest of a group. It is the objective of this paper to justify the lumping of these two thinkers as moral egoists in accordance to their common belief that actions must be done towards the achievement of self or group interests, and in accordance to their varying methods on how this is to be achieved. The moral egoism in Epicurus’ philosophy is better expressed in his quotes “We must then meditate on the things that make our happiness, seeing that when that is with us we have all, but when it is absent we do all to win it...” (Epicurus 84). In another statement he further emphasized “For we recognize pleasure as the first good innate in us, and from pleasure we begin every act of choice or avoidance, and to pleasure we return again, using the feeling as the standard...” (85). ...
Download paper

Summary

Name of of Professor Subject 16 May 2012 Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism? During the early times, philosophers were so intrigued with the patterns they observe in people and society thereby causing them to come up with reasoning that explained their interpretations or personal view of the existing systems…
Author : ylittel

Related Essays

Epicurus' View On Death
This essay describes Epicurus and his views on death. He used to be one of the most popular philosophers whose contribution to the meaning of death was persistently disregarded. Death is the topic that surrounded by considerable philosophic controversies even in modern society. According to Epicurus and his philosophical views, death is neither pleasant nor painful. Therefore, based on this premise, death cannot be bad. The researcher suggests that Epicurus may be right in that death is not worth being feared of, as long as no one can escape it. It is more reasonable and rational for people to...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
The Philosophy of Epicurus
The essay "The Philosophy of Epicurus" discusses the Epicurus's thoughts regarding the capability of everyone for seeking wisdom, the happiness to be the ultimate objective of studying philosophy and concerning religion.
...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
The Virtue of Pleasure: Epicurus
According to the postulates of Epicurus, in the life of any human being, the only chief good in life is the pleasure that individuals attain from various thoughts, actions and experiences. It is thus in the virtue of individual pleasure that Epicurus advises people to ensure that they attain maximum enjoyment in life by achieving the most pleasurable moments and experiences. The living process must therefore be full of activities and thoughts which enable human beings to have a pleasurable living experience. Epicurus justifies this by saying that pleasure is the sole good (Koen 27). Regardless...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Kant and Hobbes Comparison
Both philosophers believe in pragmatism and ethics. But Kant’s practical philosophy is concerned with the unwritten rules that govern human action while Hobbes believes that human actions are directed towards self-interest based on ethical egoism. With this, Hobbes argues that since humans tend to do things based on their self-interest, conflicts may arise when the interest of one overlaps with another or is in opposition to another. This can only be solved if humans allow others to pursue their own self-interest by doing things that will not hamper another’s pursuance of self-interest....
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Social Contraction vs. Ethical Egoism
This theory also holds that it is alright to be this way; it is rational. However, in the real world, if everybody blindly followed their hearts desires then there would be chaos. To this situation, this theory calls for application of rationality from a different angle. This angle prescribes that people should cooperate with one another and cut down on the purely self serving pursuits. This aspect defines the social contract nature of this theory (Shafer-Landau 188). People will not live life to the fullest, but they will avoid a worse fate of being in constant upheaval with society. What...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Epicurus Paper
As a result, these good and bad aspects in life are what contribute to pleasure and pain respectively. Epicurus went ahead to describe what exactly pain and please were in his understanding. He mentioned that a person may decide to choose between pain and pleasure. As a result, if an individual selects pleasure over pain in their lives, then they are prone to endure only the pleasurable things in life. Else, an individual will only endure all the bad and/ or sad events in their lives. It should be noted that Epicurus was advocating for pleasure in both dynamics- that is pleasure in the body as...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Philosophies of leadership
Most viewers during that time talked about the state of Mississippi as the most racially segregated and violent state in the US. These two aspects of racial segregation and prejudiced violence are clearly prevalent in the movie Woodstock. Philosophy of Nonviolence Leaders of the Civil Rights Movement came up with an idea of nonviolence as a weapon to destroy institutionalized racial segregation, isolation, and inequality. The same leaders later followed principles of Martin Luther King Jr. in restructuring rules of nonviolence and passive resistance. The civil rights leaders had taken long to...
3 pages (753 words) Movie Review
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!