Thomas Hobbes believed that the best way to live life is through an absolute sovereignty in the form of a government (“Thomas Hobbes”). Having different beliefs on methods of how life must be lived, both of them thought that these methods serve the self-interest of individuals. Their philosophies therefore summarize that of a moral egoist which states that it is ethical to do actions that serve an individual’s self-interest or the common interest of a group. It is the objective of this paper to justify the lumping of these two thinkers as moral egoists in accordance to their common belief that actions must be done towards the achievement of self or group interests, and in accordance to their varying methods on how this is to be achieved. The moral egoism in Epicurus’ philosophy is better expressed in his quotes “We must then meditate on the things that make our happiness, seeing that when that is with us we have all, but when it is absent we do all to win it...” (Epicurus 84). In another statement he further emphasized “For we recognize pleasure as the first good innate in us, and from pleasure we begin every act of choice or avoidance, and to pleasure we return again, using the feeling as the standard...” (85). ...
He justified this by stating that one must believe that death couldn’t affect a person as “all good and evil consists in sensation” (84). And sensations are also defined with beliefs. Having this philosophy, anybody can experience happiness so long that he can believe in the absence of pain and fears. Pleasure can be attained if there will be freedom from pain in the body and also freedom from trouble in the mind (84). Epicurus elaborated that it is only through sober reasoning that one can possess pleasure. When this philosophy is established in a person’s mind, he can then be firm on his choices and avoidance, and could not be bothered by the opinions of others therefore he can experience peace of mind (84). He reasons out that pleasure and the personal definition of it by every person or a group of persons, as agreed by a common mind, must be resolutely pursued in life and be the foundation of all actions. Epicurus was aware that this kind of philosophy is not easily ingrained in every person’s habits of thought, thus he developed logical systems that would program appropriate attitude of people following his own philosophy (Konstan). This way, the Epicurean way of thinking spread in various aspects of beliefs such as science, marriage, friendship and religion (Konstan). It is reported that such reasoning had brought intriguing philosophical arguments in other concepts although in other areas, philosophical beliefs exhibited integrity. Thomas Hobbes had a rather more straightforward moral egoistic perspective with his philosophy which states that “. . . there is no way for man to secure himself . . . that is, by force or wiles, to master the persons of all men he can, so long, till he see no other power great enough to endanger him . . .”
Name of of Professor Subject 16 May 2012 Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism? During the early times, philosophers were so intrigued with the patterns they observe in people and society thereby causing them to come up with reasoning that explained their interpretations or personal view of the existing systems…
Individuals will then apply such knowledge when faced with complex issues of decision-making. Individuals will have the independence and the strength to do the right thing, even though it might not be the most convenient (Markus& Kitayama, 1991). In children, morality is shaped by various factors, such as their interpersonal experiences they obtain from interacting with their families, peers and other adults.
John Locke’s political concept is based upon natural right and social contract theory. He proclaimed the division of powers into three branches: legislative, executive (which included judicial) and federative
2. As Socrates explains, Euthryphro’s answer suggests only an affect or quality of being pious and not the nature of piety. Since different gods view actions differently being pious is based upon what one believes in and whose god one believes in.
This paper will focus on the contribution of various authors such as Frederick Winslow Taylor, Henri Fayol and Max Weber who have applied management theories in various disciplines in terms of Classical Approach. This paper will also take into account the contributions of Douglas McGregor, Elton Mayo, and Abraham Maslow in exploring the human relation approach in various fields of management.
Due to his proximity to the great events of the time and a desire of peace and security for his fellow citizens, he believed that he should dedicate all his abilities to the problems of society. The question of a man has always been at the center of Hobbes’ creativity.
in a big dilemma because I am not sure whether I should turn my neighbor in because if I do there is a likelihood that all the money will be returned to the bank, leaving the children hopeless again. I believe it is right to turn him in because he is wrong and if I encourage
3 pages (750 words)Assignment
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism for FREE!