Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Reconstruct/Explain/Criticize an argument (PAPER2) - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

First Name, Last Tutor: 1. Galen Strawson’s against having full responsibility for what we do? According to Galen Strawson’s view, individuals are not fully responsible of what they do. In this case, his attempt was to prove that there is no existence of freewill and moral responsibility…

Extract of sample
Reconstruct/Explain/Criticize an argument (PAPER2)

However, this is not in the case of Basic argument I. According to this argument, besides the deterministic being true or false, an individual is not fully morally responsible for their action. It entails various expressions that are: nothing can be caused by itself; for one to be truly morally responsible for his action one should at least convey a certain crucial mental respect, and nothing can be fully morally responsible. Therefore, Galen Strawson tries to explain a person’s action is mostly influenced by his character, his origin, his environment and cultural differences among others. This can be true because freewill is the freedom free to do what you want not necessarily influenced by anyone or anything. Although one cannot depend entirely on freewill and moral responsibility as a consequence for one’s action. There are other factors that attribute to one’s action and an individual’s character plays a vital role. In this case, one must have concisely chosen to be the way they are. Moreover, we are also not morally responsible for character development. The concept of a character originates from a combination of qualities that differentiate an individual from another. In other words, we were not born with characters instilled in us. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Plato's Argument
One notable thing about the Allegory of the Cave is that it presents, although in brief form, a number of Plato’s philosophical assumptions. In this regard, I am referring to his belief that the way the world is revealed in our senses is not a replica of the real world but a very poor copy as such. This belief which forms one of the most prominent philosophical assumption is best manifested in the Allegory of the Cave by Plato’s likening of this state of unrealistic world view with chained prisoner’s who think that the shadows that they see behind their chained position is what…
4 pages (1004 words)
argument
God’s existence, Cosmological reasons Someone ensures the universe is in harmony. The earth revolves around the sun. The sun firmly stays comfortably in its preset place, the center of a nine planet solar system. The solar system shows that each of the nine planets do not collide against each other. The Milky Way is composed of many stars, comets, and other celestial objects. Humans cannot reach out and rearrange how the universe moves. Someone, who is God, is holding all these majestic works of art together (Viney 151). No one can say that the planets magically fell into place. No one can…
3 pages (753 words)
Argument
Descartes argues that the connection between mind and body is a wholly arbitrary without regard to the laws of physics; for instance he demonstrates that a particle striking another will move in a direction that is determined by the angle of the first particle. In contrary, in the human body, there is no connection between the physical sensations and the ensuing mental reaction; he argues that hunger pangs; for instance, have no direct connection to the reaction they provoke (Desire to eat) and can just as well produce a desire to sleep or drink (Descartes 54). In modern day, cognitive…
3 pages (753 words)
Reconstruct/Explain/Criticize an argument
It is a theory that argues against the means; happiness in this case, justifies the end. According to Kant, people should not be judged by the consequences of their action, which is to mean that the results of an action should not apply in determining whether something is right or wrong. Thus, according to Kant, the motives the person had behind their actions ought to be used to measure whether an act is right or wrong. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, is a discipline of thought that argues that the result of an action ought to justify the means through which the end was achieved. This…
4 pages (1004 words)
Provide an argument for the claim that (some) mental states are not identical to any brain state. Explain why the argument is va
It also provides reason why that argument is valid and explains the resources the monist has at her disposal to undermine our confidence in the soundness of this argument. It also evaluates the response of a monist to the dualist argument that has been provided. The argument for the claim that some mental states are not identical to any brain state is supported by various premises. First, phenomenal properties can only reside in mental substances and not physical objects such as the brain. Second, physical bodies like the brain have spatial properties while minds do not have spatial…
3 pages (753 words)
Kantian Argument
Budeau and Marshal Bedau and Cassell Budeau and marshal hold that the death penalty is morally wrong regardless of the crime committed by the offender. Both opponents of the death penalty have suggested that when analyzing whether a certain crime fit a given punishment, one must look at the impact of the punishment. This includes both the criminal and the society at large (Bedau and Cassell 118). The two argue out that capital punishment creates biased sense of security within the society. Community members feel better in the knowledge that the capital punishment is an option for a severe…
4 pages (1004 words)