The creation of an ideal superman and the philosophy of fighting for the good fo all and even killing for the same despite all personal feelings comprise the final theme of the movie. The ending might be controversial in some respects but the paper will defend his actions apart from relating my personal feelings regarding the same. The superman shows us a controversial philosophy of dealing with injustice with a bold face and taking the toughest decision of killing for good. The very concept behind the creation of a superman lies in something greater than human. But greater than human in what way is the main concern, i.e. should a superman be born with a bigger and wiser outlook towards life? Do we want to see him as more physically powerful than normal human beings or more psychological strong or be extremely benevolent and kind hearted which we are not capable of. We see a superman in our eyes and in our ways. My idea of a superman is someone who is extremely powerful and can easily kill but will not kill and show his power unnecessarily. The provocation to show his power should be extremely strong in order to actually pour out his strength and go for a killing. Here the superman fits this criteria perfectly well and kills for a reason bigger than personal benefit. So here the superman is kind hearted and shows personal feelings for the loss like other human beings but he knows what is good for the world and does exactly that without being concerned about his personal gains. It is important to give ample chance to the victim for rectifying his mistakes and the superhero did the same too unlike he ormal state laws where a criminal is arrested and might be shot down without giving a fair chance for correction. So he is above the conventions and reason of human law. At this point I believe the Man of Steel satisfies the audience psychologically in being the super hero. A true hero whom people can idolize and worship and most importantly learn from under similar circumstances. This summer we got the pleasure to satisfy our fantasy instinct through the hero of the superheroes none other than Superman. Though the title Man of Steel nowhere reflects any indications of Superman in it, but the title itself re-boots the idea of the mystery and re-imagination of the background within it. This movie is the idea of a new version of the ever imaginative Superman story. Director Zack Synder tried to unfold his imagination which audience wants to see in their real life. Now there are several questions which has been arrived. Critics have various points to rate a film. This gets a first critical view in the aspect that it shows superman in a totally different aspect. The major critic that took place is that superman here is very serious, conservative, always frustrated, chiseled and handsome but not interested in any kind of romantic affairs. He is always trying to defend the planet earth from the evil eyes of Krypton another imaginary planet from where actually superman belongs to. But as he became the son of the earth and got attached with the upbringing atmosphere he now took this as a duty to protect earth from any bad force. Many critics have complained about the movie that the movie has too much action which was not actually required. But according to my point of view I will say that though it was full of action but the use of the plot was good and effective. This is because I think the director wanted to
Philosophical discussion of a film (Man of Steel, 2013) I am writing about the movie Man of Steel in different contexts which I felt while watching this Superman movie. Critics have various points to draw a line but it always needs to justify about our personal feeling while watching a movie (Snyder)…
It is in the synchronization of these two elements that clearly define the essence of film, which is the expression of certain truths about human life in an artistic manner. However, this thinking was not accepted by all, especially the post-modern film makers.
What/ Who is the American Beauty? This is a fitting question which relates to the 1999 Academy Award Best Picture movie American Beauty. The movie is most artistic and entertaining to watch, but the film author uses an off-cam voice of main character Lester Burnham at the movie’s tail-end, saying that the movie’s message may not be easily understood.
The arguments and development of the movie is hinged on strong psychoanalytical and philosophical theories that will obviously convince one to change the way they construe seeing. This is exactly what happens with the inception movie, Leonardo is able to extract the useful information from people in their dream, and this action makes one to review their understanding of what they know about informational storage in the brain and sleep.
As the cinema narration completes within a couple of hours, the reality of the aspect or the incident or a course of action shown or narrated can be understood but with deviation from reality. Whatever reality we attribute to Cinema narration is about the accuracy of facts and clarity of the picture that is compatible with the narration and facts.
Science fiction is adaptive; it changes with the times and this trend can be seen in its incorporation of other genres, cultural history and technology. This essay will attempt to define the genre, chronicle the history and evolution, and explore its relation to technology.
The conclusion from this study states that to listen to the score of a film is to appreciate fully exactly what the filmmakers were trying to point out to us. The acting and directing and the writing is the element that primarily we remember, however, subconsciously we remember more than we give ourselves credit for.
Cinema Fantastique, more modernly and cryptically known as sci-fi, is a genre film that has often been able to peel away the pretense of civilization and dig down into the real motivations, fears and ecstasies of human nature. It does this by the creation of a
However, this thinking was not accepted by all, especially the post-modern film makers. To them, the essence of film ultimately lies on the capturing of human reality. In this regard, both the narrative coherence and creative execution of the
The Great Depression taking place during that period sets the pace of the book. The book displays Sugar Boy as a stupid person worshipping Willie’s life. Sugar Boy rarely talks in the film and displays the character of a strong and silent bodyguard. Emphasis on
2 pages (500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophical discussion with a film for FREE!