You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
The Theaetetus represents one of Plato’s dialogues relating to Plato’s dialogues concerning the nature of knowledge. Theaetetus’ first response to Socrates’ question of definition of knowledge begins with examples of knowledge such as geometry, harmony, arithmetic, and astronomy. …
Theaetetus suggests a second definition of knowledge in which he outlines that knowledge is true belief. Protagoras understandably pursued to preserve the reality of sense perception. # 1) Explain Protagoras' position in your own words Protagoras makes a philosophical statement regarding the structure of reality. Protagoras proposes that knowledge is nothing but perception. The definition of knowledge as perception draws from the Protagoras' position that man is the measure of all things. A relativistic epistemology eventually underpins any positive definitions of knowledge, and, thus, is self-refuting. The proposal that knowledge is perception means that perception is both sufficient and necessary for knowledge. This necessitates that the two conditions are separate and are pertinent in comprehending the objections to the analysis. It is essential to take note an ambiguity within the term perception (employed to refer to perception via the senses) (Zilioli 31). # 2) Give at least three arguments in your own words that Socrates uses to refute Theaetetus or Protagoras. Socrates’ seeks to raise a number of objections against the proposal that man is the measure, that knowledge is perception. The first set of objections direct against the allegation that perception is adequate for knowledge and relates to relativity of perception. ...
Not exactly what you need?