This notion continued until 1803 when an English chemist John Dalton revitalized the old notion and used it to explain various problems, which chemists at that time were struggling with. Rather than any of the experiments resulting to the idea, it surfaced from analysis of several experiments involving chemical reactions and properties of gases. Daltons theory became popularized and established experimentally in the course of early 19th century (Rogers, 2013).
Most of the points mentioned above are still recognized by most current scientists, except for some few points. First, the radioactivity and nuclear fusion/fission discovery resulted to revision of point (b). Isotopes confirm that atoms of a similar element can in reality exhibit small disparities because of a diverse number of neutrons (Mara, 2011). In addition, the ions’ existence with unreliable electrons’ numbers also contradicts this point.
Point (e) has also been nullified by nuclear physics, because atoms can certainly be destroyed in the nuclear chain reactions. Moreover, point (d)’s second item, is somewhat incorrect, as, for example, water is H2O, but not HO (Mara, 2011). Dalton’s assertion that atoms merge in equivalent amounts to create compounds delayed acceptance of the theory for a long time. In spite of today’s perspective, Dalton remarkably contributed for his time and since then his name continues to receive honor from its association with the theory.
In nuclear power, nuclear accident means events, which emit certain amount of radiation that are likely to be of harm to the health of the public and also to the environment (Bortz, 2012). Normally, the nuclear accidents are categorized as nuclear incidents and accidents by severity. In addition, while the radioactive accidents and nuclear accidents are included for perfect understanding, nuclear accident can result from the failure of a reactor of a nuclear power plant radiation. Regardless of the fact that some