The model is workable for United States because according to the data, residential houses use up to 45% of energy for space heating alone (U.S. Energy Information Administration , 1). The data also shows that residential houses use 18% of energy for water heating (Boston Business, 12). Thus, if the country would use the BTP in its buildings, it would become energy-efficient. While the approach would be appropriate in the U.S, it is undesirable. Reason being, the Unites States weather is not like the one in China. Another reason is that the technology that the country uses in buildings is not similar to the one in China. Hence, to use BTP in the country would mean change in building models.
The setting of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) Standards has been successful. The government first created the law in 1975. The government set the limits for the improvement of usage of fuel for cars from 27.5mpg to 37.8 mpg (Crovitz, 7). What the law essentially means is that the government requires the combination of the usage of fuel by cars and trucks to an average of 34.1 mpg (35% rise) by 2016. The reason the setting of the standards is successful is because of the improvement that automakers continue to make. For instance, BMW, fuel use in 2008 was 22.5%. In 2013, it became 27.4%. Similarly, Nissan’s fuel use in 2008 was 22.7%. In 2013, it became 23.1% (Crovitz, 11). If compared to the tax that the government adds for every gasoline that a car owner purchases in a gas station, the CAFÉ standards are better than the tax. Reason being, with a growing economy, people have more disposable income than they had. Therefore, they will have a cushion for the tax that the government adds. It will end up having no effect in energy consumption and conservation efforts.
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. "Building Technologies Office | Department of Energy." Office