The information comes from reputable sources such as the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, and U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Office of Planning and Analysis. The source has no bias because it presents a logical argument about a beneficial energy source that is expensive. I have chosen this source because it compares the cost of nuclear energy and other alternative energy sources. The author mentions ways for reducing the cost of construction of nuclear plants to make it affordable in the society.
The main topic of the article is improving efficiency in nuclear power plants. It discusses innovative techniques and safety measures that can ensure nuclear energy plants maintain efficiency. The author supports nuclear power. He chooses this position because he believes that there are innovative measures that can ensure safety in nuclear power plants. Their arguments are based on latest research on technology that is useful in nuclear power plants. The source is credible because it discusses incremental innovations in the digital world, and enhancements of safety margins in an existing power plant. I have chosen this source because it provides a solution for risks involved in nuclear power plants. The dangers and effects of nuclear plants remain the greatest challenge that opponents of nuclear energy discuss.
The main topic of the article is making nuclear energy sustainable. The paper analyzes and reviews the challenges that nuclear power must get through before the society accepts it as a sustainable energy source. Pearce is obviously against nuclear power as an energy source because it is not sustainable. He chose this position because of its associated environmental burdens, specifically greenhouse gas emissions and nuclear and radioactive waste disposal. In addition, he cites nuclear insecurity as a danger of nuclear energy,