Realist and Neo-Realist International Relations

College
Essay
Politics
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
The dominant approach in international relations theory for virtually the past two millennia, from Thucydides to Machiavelli to Morgenthau, has been Realism, also known as Political Realism. Realists come in many stripes. Most notably, they divide between Classical Realists and Contemporary Structural Realists or Non-realists…

Introduction

The state, for Realism, is a power-maximizer in a self-help environment where no one can be trusted and violence is endemic. Non-Realist IR theory is invariably also anti-Realist. It never ignores Realism, but always incorporates a critique of that paradigm to position itself intellectually. This is because Realism is about the state. Since we cannot evade the state, which is everywhere and all around us and the centre-piece of our political cosmology, neither can IR theory evade Realism.
Empirical "tests" may show that certain events in the world are (not in) consistent with the hard core of a realist research program. But that does not provide support in any strong sense of that term for choosing realism over some competing paradigm. Many events that are explained by one realist theory are also inconsistent with at least one other no less authentic realist theory. For instance, if balancing and bandwagoning exhaust the possible aligning bahaviours of states, as Waltz (1979) suggests they do, and if good realist theories predict each, as they do, then any piece of evidence simultaneously confirm and contradicts "realism".
Labs provide an extreme example of the perspective when he presents offensive (rather than defensive) realism as "the best realist theo ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Rational Choice Theory and Neo - functionalism
International Relations deal with human behavior in the largest of all social groups: the international society. Hedley Bull (1977), one of the founders of ‘international society’ approach states that “The starting point of international relations is the existence of states, or independent political communities, each of which possesses a government and asserts sovereignty in relation to a…
Realist and Neo-Realist International Relations
The state, for Realism, is a power-maximizer in a self-help environment where no one can be trusted and violence is endemic. Non-Realist IR theory is invariably also anti-Realist. It never ignores Realism, but always incorporates a critique of that paradigm to position itself intellectually. This is because Realism is about the state. Since we cannot evade the state, which is everywhere and all…
International Relations Master Essay
What was it that made people revolt against the leadership of the former Soviet Union Did the people see a better and secure life far from Marxism Was Liberalism and Realism what they craved for The term critical theory is used in a very broad perspective in international relations theory. In the rest of social science it is typically used to refer to the ideas of the Frankfurt School of German…
Realism
Various heated arguments have developed on realism and many scholars have come out their own construed versions of the perceived realism. Kenneth Waltz argues that all of the various explanations for the causes of war can be easily filtered into three images: that of man, the state and the international system. …
International Politics in Twentieth Century
I will begin by giving a liberal account f the relationship between the economy, the state and power.…
Globalisation and International Relations
The study of international relations as a theory is based on a model that helps in the analysis of international relations. However the theories of international relations can take different approaches based on constructivist, liberalist or realist perspectives. Liberalism would emphasise only the advantages of globalisation arguing for the need of open and free market policy. Some economists and…
Role of Cooperation in Controlling Anarchy
Cowen and Sutter (2005) take on this viewpoint to argue that although collusion requires more cooperation than arbitration, arbitration requires more organisation than coordination.…