Before answering the question whether the EU should focus on being a civilian, normative, or military power, it is important to establish how these different forms of power have historically manifested in the EU's policies and activities. Conceptualising the terms 'civilian', 'normative', and 'military' is important in any analysis where these terms are used to describe the activities of EU's. Maull's (1990) view of a civilian power includes the employment of "solidarity with other societies, and a sense of responsibility for the future of the world - and particularly the global environment". (p.106) It is important to note that Maull's analysis of the exercise of civilian power is quite restrictive as it relates to the state or the exercise of national civilian power. Thus using a 'statist' perspective of the exercise of civilian power in the context of a supranational EU, would have its possible limitations. Vital lessons can, however, be drawn from his analysis and can be transposed into the EU's experience. Manner's (2002) conception of the EU as a civilian power is interpreted primarily in economic terms. Simply put, civilian power can be said to be the exercise of non-military power and would include "economic, diplomatic and cultural policy instruments." (Smith, n.d. p.1) Smith's conception of civilian power would thus exclude any use of the military, even if the military were used in situations of peace-keeping, whether armed or unarmed. To Smith (n.d.) even though the military can be used in unarmed peace-keeping situations, they have also been trained to kill and thus such an activity cannot be said to be civilian. Smith (n.d.) further identifies four core elements in the exercise of civilian power - "means; ends; use of persuasion; and civilian control over foreign (and defence) policymaking". (p.2) Consequently, in employing civilian policies, the means and the ends of those policies must be non-military, with persuasion (and not coercion) being the main instruments of achieving policy objectives. Based on the above conception of civilian power, Smith (n.d.) has argued in relation to the EU that: " clinging to the notion of civilian power EU not only stretches the term 'civilian' past its breaking point, but also tends to induce excessively rosy-eyed views of the EU as an international actor. 'Civilian' often means 'good', and deploying the 'civilian power EU' argument can close down critical analysis of actual EU foreign policy activities". (p.1) With regards to concepts of normative power, Manners (2002) views the EU's normative power as its capacity to mould or influence notions of what constitutes 'normal' in politics at the international arena. This exercise of normative power is very evident in the EU's relationship with Africa. The Council of the European Union has for instance stated that "Europe has a strong interest in a peaceful, prosperous and democratic Africa. Our strategy is intended to help Africa achieve this."
This essay will attempt to address pertinent issues that flows from the EU’s burgeoning role in European and in international affairs. Is the leverage that the EU wields one of a civilian, normative, or military power? Should the EU focus on any particular one of these powers?…
The essay will explore issues of foreign policy related to the use of national armies in international peace, reconstruction, and conflict operations as an extension of EU policy within the context of political dissent. Finally, the essay will analyze the difference between qualified majority voting and universal consensus as it relates to Lisbon requirements on foreign policy decisions and the use of military force by the European Union.
The EU has been of great importance in defining the direction taken by most of the world policies and decisions in the most effective way such that they always set precedence in their decisions. It has always worked as the political object in matters of international politics and largely affects the diplomacy in all corners of the globe.
The view of European Union (EU) being a civilian power has gained significant considerations and this has certainly led to animated deliberations since its inception, whereby often the concept of civilian power has been used to define and designate the role of EU as an actor in the international politics.
ublic leadership positions that represent the EU officially, creating the possibility that the sectarian issues that have divided European politics traditionally could result in factionalism under the new structure. This essay will first look at the leadership of the EU that
The subject matter of international relations is purely infinite, ranging from war, population change, global warming, the war on terror, unequal development, international organizations like the EU and the changes in power between china and the United States. The aspect of IR has become an aspect of political science.
The aspect of IR has become an aspect of political science. The two world wars and the cold war resulted due to the existence of certain phenomena like war, diplomacy, the balance of power, the several implications of sovereignty, international law and strategy that were insufficiently treated elsewhere in the social sciences.
For example, many researchers examined the EU as a “transformative” power (Leonard, 2005), a “post-modern power” (Cooper, 2003)¸ a “civilian power” (Telo, 2007), an “ethical power” (Aggestam 2008), a “soft power”
15 pages (3750 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org