President Eisenhower's Farewell Address to the nation in 1961 outlined quite a controversial plan for the future safety of America. Through the militarization of his country, Eisenhower believed that the United States could prosper in peace without ever having to actually use the military force that had been acquired since the Second World War…
Eisenhower said that "a vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment". The two factors - peace and military might - are naturally at odds with each other and as such it is strange to find that the terms are so often promoted in conjunction with one another. Indeed, America continues along this line of logic still today, albeit in a different way than the former President had imagined. Eisenhower truly believed that the best way to secure peace for his nation was to become impenetrable; he thought that building one of the strongest military forces in the world would dissuade any potential enemies from acting out in a violent manner and taking American lives. Certainly it can be said that no other nation has waged war on America in the years following the Farewell Address, however the crucial difference between Eisenhower's vision and current American military exploits is the use of force upon other nations like Afghanistan and Iraq. Modern America pursues enemies that it perceives as ideological and terrorist threats; in the attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq the United States has sought to retaliate for calculated attacks on American soil. The very presence of terrorism in the modern United States can show both how Eisenhower was justified in his belief of military might for peace, and how despite this proven ideology enemies find ways to strike. America's military strength means that no other nation in the world would seek open combat; therefore opposing views and enemy forces will not be represented by other states but as smaller, dynamic organizations.
The President also stressed his belief that America should not rely on the emergency weaponry that could be created by its own individual citizens at short notice; this was the military history of Eisenhower and he was concerned that in the future America should be able to count on its own federal arms reserve. The President had seen the world thrown into war as Nazi Germany and Japan tried to conquer foreign nations and eradicate entire groups of people they considered expendable. Stopping the German forces became one of the most difficult tasks the Allied forces would ever face, and as a result it is understandable that President Eisenhower worried about the future state of his country's military. Certainly in the face of international advancements in terms of arms, the United States could not afford to sit back and hope it would have no need for its military forces to be well-equipped. At the point of the Farewell Address, American federal funding had been vastly increased to its military and Eisenhower expressed his hope that this would continue to be increased as the country invested in scientific research that could change the face of the military completely. The President does not seem to have taken into consideration the fact that at the cue of the United States, other developed nations would decide to bulk up their own military forces in response. Specifically, take the Cold War into consideration and it is easy to see how this idea of an impenetrable nation is inextricable linked to the perception of a dangerous nation. In advancing further and ...
Cite this document
(“America at War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/276541-america-at-war
(America at War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“America at War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/276541-america-at-war.
The American civil war occurred due to many social and economic differences between the North and the South. The South relying on cotton and slavery had a financial system supported by cash crops. There were no industries and factories in the South to produce weapons and bombs, their railroads were not organized therefore they could not move their foodstuff, armaments and men rapidly over elongated distances.
A combination of unfortunate timing of the assassination alongside the growing internal tension among European powers gave vent in the form of a war on a massive scale. Alongside these factors, the rise of nationalistic fervor in some European nations, with the attendant tendencies toward imperialism and militarism had made the outbreak of the war inevitable.
World War II, Cold War and Post-War America Part 1: The World War II, Involvement and Interests of America: America tried its level best to remain in complete isolation during the war time though; America feared that Axis powers might overcome the major portion of the globe.
Thus, after the WWII the US and the USSR embarked on a passive confrontation in which either side would extend support to those countries or regions that stood up for their ideologies. In this case, Vietnam was split into two parts; the North and the South (Anderson 77).
The author will briefly analyze the events that resulted that to the defeat of the Versailles treaty with particular attention to the role of President Woodrow Wilson during and after the war. The eruption of the war was not only caused by immediate chain of events but also some deep root causes.
From Presidents Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy and Johnson to Nixon’s time, Vietnam War continued as an extended attempt to pursue United States’ foreign policy of containment of Communism in favor of establishing liberal institutions and enabling expansion of democratic regimes not only in Europe but also in Middle East, Asia and East Asia.
To a large extent, the fundamental driver of motivation behind America’s entrance into war with Germany is her partiality with the Britain in comparison to Germany. The same happens to be the driver of Germany’s motivation.
lief has been core cause for revolution, evolution and formation of histories as well as nations.Not only this, but the word is used to display the affection for the nation and zero tolerance policy for those who are against the nation. Therefore, nationalism presupposes
The United States of America moved to Latin America due to geopolitical and economic factors and it’s the same factors influenced the communist states to move from their countries to Latin America. In the end, others like the Soviets also felt the need for the Latin America.
that a simple set of causes and even though there was a series of occurrences that clearly resulted in the fighting, the key root causes are more profound and have continued to be debated and discussed.
Numerous, alliances, which are agreements made between several nations to
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic America at War for FREE!