Capitalism encourages inequality in the pursuit of wealth and property and undermines Democracy and its pursuit of equality and a voice for all people. Voters allow the government to hear their voice by voting on the issues and the candidate that best represents their view on the issues. However, a voter discouraged by the economy and the government has a tendency not to vote and their voice is not heard. Is the government really listening to the people anyway Political Parties take money to finance campaigns (sometimes as bribes and sometimes legitimately) from wealthy businesses with the promise to provide something for that wealthy constituent. Capitalism creates an inequality in the distribution of wealth and a class system forms. Capitalism's inequality subverts Democracy.
"Marx argued that as long as Capitalism and private property exist there could be no genuine democracy." (Almond 469) The free market produces inequality in the distribution of political and economic resources. Capitalism creates competition in society to obtain property and wealth, however, only a small percentage of citizens obtain wealth and prosperity. The uneven distribution of wealth and property created by capitalism causes the formation of a class system. The middle class is the majority of the democratic voice and the middle class voice should be the predominating voice in the democratic system. However, the wealthy finance the campaigns of the political parties or bribe them to gain a stronger voice in the government. This undermines democracies desire for equality and a voice for all citizens. The many decisions of the government effects what happens in the economy causing the free market to "imprison policymaking". (Lindbloom 329) A promise made to a wealthy constituent against the better judgment of the political parties could affect the economy with negative results and an economy that is not very productive in turn discourages the citizens. Discouraged citizens tend to cause a decrease in voter turnout where the opposite should be true. The decrease in voter turnout decrease the voice that they have to create change in the government and therefore increases the opportunity for the wealthy to increase their voice in the government and this creates a never-ending circle - a prison. The opposite could also be true, however, if voters come together to voice their disapproval it is not the wealthy business owners that take the fall it is the government officials. " When a decline in prosperity and employment is brought about by decisions of corporate and other business activities it is not they but the government who consequently are retired from tier offices." (Lindbloom 329) Punishing the government officials only solves half the problem because the wealthy will still influence the government with their vast resources. Wealth may be needed to create economic growth, however, the unequal distribution of w