In applying for EU membership, the ten CEE candidate states are aspiring to become members of an enlarged, pan-European area for free movement of labour. From an economic point of view, free movement of labour has been part of the project of achieving equality of opportunity within the EU by dismantling obstacles to the mobility of factors of production…
However, in wider political terms, the tolerance of the principle of free labour movement is an important signal of a willingness to treat the citizens of one EU member state as welcome within any other' (Wallace 2004: 3).
In the last couple of decades, EU labour migration policies have been largely aimed at preventing labour migration from outside while encouraging labour mobility inside. The eastern enlargement of the EU presents a case whereby, according to the logic of enlargement, nationals coming from the accession states would be treated more like members and would be allowed access to the EU labour market.
An increasing migration trend since the 1990s has been the search for temporary--as opposed to permanent--migration, especially from the CEE countries. This kind of migration does not involve residential settlement and does not pose a burden on the welfare states in Western Europe--short-term, income-seeking migrants will usually not draw any public welfare provisions they are entitled to receive (such as medical insurance, social security and unemployment benefits) from the home country. The great majority of Poles, Czechs and Hungarians who contemplate possibilities for migration think of it as a supplement to (not replacement of) their home-country earnings (Morawska 2000). The trend towards temporary migration is demonstrated in a May 2001 survey on labour movement from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria after accession. Twelve per cent of them intended to work for longer than two years and 13 per cent to settle permanently (CEORG 2001). These forms of migration target the country of origin in the end, because the transfers of money and skills emanating from these movements are, in turn, leading to further economic growth within the sending countries (Langewiesche 2000: 15). An increasing tendency in Eastern Europe is incomplete migration' (Okolski 2001). This is a form of mass mobility of very short duration, often documented as tourism, which involves petty trade in cross-border regions.
Although the expansion of the EU towards the east will create immigration to the EU member states, it will not lead to significant numbers of immigrants from the new states. A study conducted by the European Integration Consortium at the request of the Employment and Social Affairs Directorate General of the European Commission on the impact of eastern enlargement on employment and wages in the EU concludes that one should not fear massive immigration. According to the study, the number of foreign residents from the CEE countries in the EU would increase annually by around 335,000 immediately after the introduction of free movement of persons. The issue of free movement of labour became prominent during the negotiations for accession between the EU and Greece, Portugal and Spain in the 1980s. It resulted in transition periods for the mobility of labour. Greece joined the European Community in 1981 and only in 1986 was its labour force allowed to move freely in the EU. Spain and Portugal entered the EU in 1986 with restrictions on labour movement ...
Cite this document
(“European Union and Free Movement of Labour Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/278876-european-union-and-free-movement-of-labour
(European Union and Free Movement of Labour Essay)
“European Union and Free Movement of Labour Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/278876-european-union-and-free-movement-of-labour.
This research is governed by the following research questions, which will aid in attaining objectives and aim of the research: To what extent does the European Union policy of free movement of persons discriminate against the non-European 'others'? Labor immigration policy has to be revised and affected properly.
The researcher of this present essay will attempt to discuss the jurisprudence behind the European court of justice in adopting this legislation effectively. This essay will also briefly capture some its landmark decisions, with special emphasis on the application the treaty to private parties and some concluding remarks.
The report will cover the following: Evolution of the Law on the Mobility of Labour in the European Union; Overview of Regulation 1612/68 & Discrimination against EU workers and their families; Overview of Directive 68/360 & Entry of EU Citizens to other Member States; Jurisprudence from the European Court of Justice; Enforceability against private parties.
The relevant law relating to eligibility for receiving social benefits is discussed below. Advice to Nicolas has been rendered in the discussion and conclusion part of this memorandum. Relevant legal position. Free movement of workers within the European Union is governed by the following legislations.
non-EU citizens1. It is indeed ironical that the EU allows movement of people freely within its member states but takes a harsh approach towards immigrants. This Xenophobic approach of the EU is rooted in historical, political, social and economic contexts as we shall discuss in this proposal: Historical The first paragraph will talk about the historical perspective or aspect of the Xenophobic approach of the EU whereby it will expound on this idea: Even before the EU was formed as an entity, the countries of Europe adopted a policy of restraint in matters of immigration as it was felt that given the size of the economies, it would not be possible for the member countries to welcome immigran
The knock-on-effect-changing model will likewise be utilized in this realm. Likewise, literatures on the concept of labor and employment will be used, alongside those pertaining to migration, low pay, and shortage of employees. The labor market dynamics model will be discussed in synergy to these.
The first part of this discussion seeks to determine whether the inauguration of citizenship of the EU can be classed as a simple political metaphor without any additional significance or whether it can be considered as extending the scope of the rights already existing in the European Treaties
The Netherlands may seek relief for enforcement of the EC decision to lift its ban on poultry exports from the Netherlands to the UK under the provisions of European Community Law. By virtue of Section 2 of The European Community Act 1972, the United Kingdom indorsed European Law making it binding on the United Kingdom.
The trade union organizations act independently irrespective of any particular employer. They try to develop a healthy working relationship with the employers so that a business partnership can be formed between the employees and the employer (Indirect, 2014). The
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic European Union and Free Movement of Labour for FREE!