Justification of political authority is one of the fundamental questions in political philosophy. There are multiple issues and controversies involved in this major problem including the meaning of political authority, the distinction between political authority and political power, moral and legal aspects of political authority, and many others…
However, some thinkers do not perceive the attitude of subjects toward such authority as the decisive factor. Thus, Thomas Hobbes and John Austin argue that political authority in the de facto sense simply amounts to the capacity of an individual or community to maintain public order as well as secure the obedience of most people by issuing commands backed by sanctions. Consequently, the legitimacy of authority as perceived by subjects is not important and any entity that is de facto performs the function of authority is always justified (Hobbes 1668).
Another essential aspect of the authority debate is its distinction from political power. In politics it is a common practice to use the terms power and authority interchangeably though the meaning of these terms is different. The difference lies mainly in the fact that 'authority' involves a claim of justification and legitimate right to exercise power over the subjects while 'power' implies a mere ability to achieve certain goals and does not necessarily involve a claim of justification and/or legitimacy (Arendt, 1968).
Thus, political power relates to the state's ability to get citizens to act in a certain manner even despite their reluctance. Furthermore, political power does not require a positive attitude from the subjects and does not depend on its actual success at securing public order. Threats and offers are the key elements of political power: "Evidently, for the state to have de facto authority or legitimate authority requires that the state have the power to compel those subjects who do not wish to go along. This is necessary for the state's ability to maintain public order and to assure those who do see it as an authority that it will be able to do what it is supposed to do" (Zalta, 2004). Therefore, the term 'authority' in the meaning of political authority is more applicable for the purposes of this paper.
There are a number of different discourses on the nature, legitimacy and justification of political authority. Normally, three fundamental types of conceptions about legitimacy of political authority: political authority as justified coercion, political authority as the capacity to impose duties, and political authority as the right to rule (Zalta, 2004).
The first conception relies on the moral aspect in justifying a political authority which coerces the subjects. The essence of this conception is that a political authority might have the justifiable moral right to coerce its subjects. For example, a group of people may be morally justified in engaging in just a few actions of coercing others. Or a group may be morally justified in engaging in coercion more generally as in the case of a morally justified military occupation.
This notion of authority does not necessarily involve duties on the part of the coerced people: on the contrary, avoiding or escaping coercion may be justified. One example of such situation could the situation of a military occupation of a state justified under the pretext of using such occupation as a tool to prevent a third power from engaging in morally unjustified aggression. Although this conception relies on moral justification of coercion used by political authority, the authority in this case is not able to either issue commands or make laws: it is justified on ...
Cite this document
(“Justification of Political Authority Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 7500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/283703-justification-of-political-authority
(Justification of Political Authority Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 7500 Words)
“Justification of Political Authority Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 7500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/283703-justification-of-political-authority.
Moreover, it explains the impact in which power and authority is further used in decision making especially in organizations and business entities. Introduction Power Power is a word that has numerous definitions in relation to the use of the concept. The common definition of power is the ability to do something or act in a particular way.
A pure economic perspective suggests the Water Treatment Plant as a better option owing to the comparatively less expenditure. But a combined environmental and economic evaluation provides a different result. The benefits from the Combined Heat and Power like the production of clean energy, saving considerable amount of power and reduced carbon emissions are of high environmental value.
Political Authority and Morality Political authority can be justified in those zones where focus is on giving the rights to the people. This is true in the case of a democratic entity where people are given the right to choose a leader for their own selves.
Societies, over time, have always had disciplinary measures for undesirable behavior, which mostly happens within social institutions such as families, schools, churches or correction centers. Someone in authority always administers punishment over a junior person, for behavior that they consider inappropriate.
It is due to this research that the concept of the artworks has been able to establish its institutions. Intersections of art, technology and science based on the collaborative trans-disciplinary research have also gained a lot of institutional support. According to Manovich, he states that the use of digital computing as one of the cultural forms is noted as a new media which is fundamental and also includes unprecedented properties which are able to establish new relationship between the user and the media (Manovich, 334).
He began the book to defend claims that since Romans have adopted new faith, the Christianity so the Roam has fell as old Gods no longer protected it. His theme is based on his belief that the society is made up of angels and man. The angels are good while man is self-centered and wicked.
Despite certain similarities that were largely due to similar historic and intellectual context of the Enlightenment, the philosophers maintained dramatic differences in their views on social structure, political organization and the nature of human being.
Majority of contemporary political theorists consider that the state has authority in the descriptive sense. This means that the state maintains public order via creating rules and issuing commands that subjects generally
The leaders are accountable for their actions and behaviors, and usually do the right thing because otherwise they would have to present their case in front of the publics. Political authority seems justified when there are norms and procedures that take care of the political manifestations and when people are given what they deserve the most – democracy.
Among the three political theories, the most significant and promising is the principle of fairness. The State, as governed by the principle of fairness, has the capability to settle social and political issues effectively, and its
The author of this paper explains that Hobbes and Locke have contributed significantly to the field of political science. Both theorists tend to have similar views with regard to where power emanates in the society. They both support the constitution or popular contract as an avenue where the people give the power to rule.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Justification of Political Authority for FREE!