National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush

College
Essay
Politics
Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 0
Bill Clinton and George Bush view national security strategy as a critical component of the financial security and foreign policy of the country. Their approaches towards this policy differed to some extent, and this paper is aimed to underline the major differences and similarities between policies outlined in each national security strategy.

Introduction

In contrast, President Bush provides the policy of national power maximization and international cooperation against terrorism as a major threat of contemporary world order and peace. His national policy reflects the events and the threats America now faces (terrorism). In general, Bush's policy is more radical in comparison with American foreign policy tradition. In contrast to Clinton, Bush supports pre-emptive military action against hostile states and terrorist groups seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction.
As well as Clinton, Bush calls for engagement, but in the way of cooperation especially marked that the USA "will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary" (2002) to defend national interests and security. The major difference is that Bush reject the single-minded approach, adopted by Clinton, of multilateralism for its own sake. The similarity of both strategies is that they calls for spreading democracy and human rights in other countries, but Bush underlined that this is especially important for Muslim countries today. Both of them are aimed to protect American nation creating strong foreign security policy, but Clinton and Bush employ different doctrines to support their foreign policies. Also, the similarity is that Clinton and Bush view U.S. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

National Security Master Essay
The pain, suffering, fear in the eyes of those inside the Twin Towers as well as those watching, in front of them or around the world through TV, related or not, was evident. As the towers fell and turned into rubble, so did the hope of life of those inside, in the minds of their friends and families. This day alone changed the entire picture of how national security and terrorism were viewed, the…
Going Public Strategy from Reagan to Bush
Bush. Through these twenty years we have seen this science developed to such an extent that we have to ask whether it is public opinion that shapes presidential initiatives or presidential initiatives that shape public opinion in the United States.…
National Security Strategy Bill Clinton vs. George Bush
In contrast, President Bush provides the policy of national power maximization and international cooperation against terrorism as a major threat of contemporary world order and peace. His national policy reflects the events and the threats America now faces (terrorism). In general, Bush's policy is more radical in comparison with American foreign policy tradition. In contrast to Clinton, Bush…
National Security Case Study
But could the security services in the country have done better in preventing these shocking attacks. According to the Guardian (2006), the reports on the cross party intelligence and security committee into the London terrorist's attacks of 7 July 2005 did not find any "evidence of an intelligence failure that could have prevented the bombings." It further says that it only identified…
George H.W. Bush Presidency
("Like") On the other hand, President Bush had his own shares of defeat. In the 1980 Republican presidential nominations, he was unsuccessful in winning the bid. But in 1981, he served as the country's vice president for eight years under the Reagan administration. And it was only in 1988 when he had finally won the Republican nomination for President, for which he took Dan Quayle as his running…
Speaking style of President Bill Clinton
The main purpose of the speech is to explain necessity of democratic development of Yugoslavia. His speech is rather persuasive: in the beginning of his speech Clinton includes general introductory appeal to the auditory to show the current political situation in Eastern Europe, and then he goes deep into details. The citation from Franklin Roosevelt as a great political authority gives more…
United States National Security
Michael Ignatieff (2002) characterizes weak and collapsing states as the chief source of human rights abuses in the post-cold war world as these states comprise the world's most poor population that are easily disposed to resorting to violence against other groups, their own governments or international terrorism primarily in a battle of survival. James Wolfensohn, formerly of the World Bank,…