This research will begin with the statement that in recent years the relations between EU and Russia have been more baffling than we could possibly imagine. Europe has lost its strategic loadstar. Having absorbed 27 countries, Europe is in the state of a dilemma regarding expansion or regarding the issue of dealing with Russia. Russia too realized that its renewed government style was not in a very happy term or relationship with EU which it did not expect and so the relations after EU Enlargement have been more or less a confusing state of affairs. After the formation of European Union, things have changed drastically for the people and governments near them. Russia is no exception. We all know that Soviet bloc was split in 1991 and soviet era republics became independent. Not to mention the fact that some countries which have the Russian flair in its growth and development have suddenly become free and have joined EU. These East European Countries have led to core formation of European Union. Thus it was soon understood that Russia has lost some of its key allies in the process and that it finds itself in isolation both in terms of geographic and political platforms. Another fact is that these East European countries have displeasure with what the Soviet Union has treated them. The ideologies were different and there was resentment in these countries over the rule of Soviet Union. Also, the eastern bloc was not too happy with the way military section was withdrawn from those places. Factually speaking as the times moved the ideological differences grew so high that though they had same set of language and culture, they were in fact poles part in government If we talk about relations with Europe then we can say there were issues which actually have affected the relationship between them. The enlargement of NATO, the wars in the Balkan region and more importantly the agenda of the EU were the main issues. Apart from these the internal issues of Russia have become a significant factor of relations between them.
In this paper we look at the issue of Russia and EU relations and we will be considering some core issues like EU enlargement and relationship levels among them by considering the security, human rights, political and economic factors which affect both of them
May 2004 was historic month of the European Union History when as many as 10 countries joined EU and this included 3 of previous Soviet bloc nations and similarly in 2007 two eastern European nations joined the league, thus the major part of Europe with the exception Russia was part of the league and this was main issue among their relations. The reason for a low relation level with Russia was the different ideologies of the states. Post 1990’s soviet transition government has different perception levels when compared the ideology followed by EU. One thing we need to understand is that EU is Russia’s main partner when it comes to trade and commerce and so let’s look at the impact of this enlargement in terms of economic perspectives of both the countries.
We know that Russia is a country, where the contribution of production to the domestic market is fairly high. At the same time, in some EU member states production output directed to domestic market is shrinking drastically. Apparently, these countries chose to be export-driven economies and are successfully trying to integrate into international division of labor by penetrating new markets with competitive goods and concurrently ceding domestic markets to more competitive foreign products. Undoubtedly, they are more dependent on the world economy than Russia.
If we look at the economic consequences of the result on enlargement of EU with respect to the relations of EU-Russia we can say that it has two sides of the coin, one which talks from Russian point of view and other form European view. Analysts of Russian view focused on negative implications from custom tariff hikes for separate commodities. They talked about problems associated with goods movement through the newly joined
This paper will attempt to look at the issue of Russia and EU relations and the researcher will be considering some core issues like EU enlargement and relationship levels among them by considering the security, human rights, political and economic factors which affect both of them…
Since the end of World War II British foreign policy has consisted of the management of decline”. Assess this proposition. The British foreign policy sustenance has a direct link with the economic stability of the country .
Therefore, freedom can influence the American policies, by enabling the country to intervene in other countries where freedom of the people is in jeopardy. This often leads to US-led military action against dictatorial governments across the world, if diplomacy fails to guarantee the masses of their freedom.
However this does not appear to be the case. There appears to be similarities between the Bush Doctrine and the policies of the Obama administration which only serve to indicate a new manifestation of neoconservativeness disclosure evident in Obama’s foreign Policies.
The new oil wealth is more effective for realising the foreign policy goals of the resurgent Russia.
Qualitatively speaking, Russia no more is a defunct military super power but a rising energy super power. Undeniably, Russia has inherited much of the former Soviet Union's hard power including a powerful nuclear arsenal and a sophisticated army.
Russia has followed an assertive and reactive foreign policy up to now. Since 1998, the country has grown stronger, with favorable conditions in the energy market contributing to an improvement in its economic position. The country has followed an intelligent macroeconomic policy which is reflected in its slowly growing power on the international stage.
Yet there is no much consensus over how to conceptualize the European Union's actorness. EU's actorness or the EU's condition or not as an international actor has been related to the existence of a 'European Foreign Policy' (EFP). However instead of measuring the EU's external behavior and its policymaking in order to conclude if there is or not an European Foreign Policy, the theoretical interest has been mainly centered in the theoretical capability-expectations gap and in categorizing and defining not the EFP but the EU's international role.
The breakthrough year was 2004, when Russia experienced the regime changes, usually refered to as the "color revolutions" in Georgia and Ukraine, when more pro-western governments have replaced the leaders of these countries. It were these particular events, together with Putins reelection, that started the change in rhetorics and practices of Russia's foreing policy and the cooperative mode of Western behavior towards Russia began changing to competitive or even confrontational positions.
Vladimir Putin's international moves have sent some strong signals to EU and USA. Moscow's strategic cooperation with Washington and Brussels has given enthusiastic cries in those countries.
Our discussion today revolves around the nature of foreign policy of Russia and its pragmatic nature in the present day world politics.
es for a certain group or person and the establishment of enabling environment; or the lack of lived situations of coercion, for example political coercion in the United States society. Whereas political liberty is usually misunderstood to mean the liberty from irrational
Russia still perceives itself as a powerful nation and has often used its power to portray its identity across the globe1. The country has made use of its great power identity projection through the utilization of energy
16 pages (4000 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org