1. This policy paper is addressed to the European Commissioner. It sets out the economic arguments for the enlargement of the European Union. It recommends the European commission to support the enlargement of the EU in favour of better health of the economy of each member state and the EU as a whole…
On January 01, 2007 in total membership of the bloc were 25 member states. The last two members to join were Bulgaria and Romania. These two are the poorest members of EU. They comprise less than 1% off its GDP while contributing 6% of the EU's population. But these economies are growing fast, at about 5-7% per year. (BBC News) Croatia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have received "candidate" status as a precursor of membership. Turkey also started membership talks in October, 2005. Albania, Bosnia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia are also expected to start discussions for membership. But these countries will have to face increasing opposition to enlargement of EU from some member states. The major opposition comes from five member states - Austrian, France, Germany, Luxembourg and United Kingdom.
2.2 There was serious opposition when the idea of a European union was first broached. The main arguments offered against enlargement were: it would lead to mass immigration from poorer countries to the richer nations, with the result that poor countries would take away jobs from the richer ones and companies also would relocate to countries which offer lower labour costs and lower social protection; the poor countries would require huge subsidies from the richer member states. But several arguments were also given in favour of the enlargement. Most of these arguments have been borne out by fact, giving support to the policy of enlargement. The main economic argument in favour of enlargement is that access to more countries would stimulate and boost long term dynamic economic growth in the relatively poor economies. There would be gains from trade and investment benefiting the EU member states, along with an expansion of the internal market by nearly 500 million consumers offering major growth opportunities in all the member states. It is estimated that there would be an increase in the economic growth to the tune of 60-80 billion and expansion of 300,000 new jobs as a result of enlargement. ("The Economic and Business Benefits of Enlargement," 2001)
3. Factors of Growth
3.1 The economic gains are expected to be driven by four factors:
1. An increase in foreign direct investment and capital flows among the member states, due to a common political and regulatory framework and a level playing field for all 27 or more economies.
2. An increase in immigration would, contrary to expectations, drive economic growth, and the cheaper labour which will become available to the richer European nations would help in competing against low labour cost countries like India or China. The richer member states would be gaining more from being members of a single market than it costs them in transfers to the poorer countries.
3. An increase in business confidence across all the countries of the European Union would be helpful in rising trading and skills standards, improving productivity, technology transfers, modernizing plant and equipment and providing with better environment and social standards.
4. The European Union would increase confidence in the political and economic futures of its member states, and require legal and administrative reform, and stable laws, regulations and standards with better implementation. This enables companies to ...
Cite this document
(“Enlargement of European Union Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/295703-enlargement-of-european-union
(Enlargement of European Union Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
“Enlargement of European Union Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/295703-enlargement-of-european-union.
Thus, during the last eight years, the European Union has expanded from 15 to 27 states. Given that the process of expansion is properly implemented, it promotes the transformation of many European countries into democratic and prosperous states. However, many people still consider the process of EU further enlargement to be harmful for European welfare.
For instance, countries have budgets to, which require expansive engagement with other countries to achieve reasonable growth and prosperity. Countries also have security demands, which they can only address when cooperating with others. In addition, countries have populations that always demand jobs to generate income for sustenance over particular period.
Besides, the 2010th may be a timeline for further enlargement as Ukraine, Turkey and former Yugoslavia republics (Serbia and Montenegro, Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina) are also standing in queue (Archick, 2005).
Historically, each stage if EU enlargement used to cause the "displacement of powers" on the continent.
There is quite an elongated roll of high historical characters, which, in pretty diverse ways, trailed an idea of integrated Europe. These personalities are Charlemagne, Napolen, Charles V, and Metternich. Incidentally, even the infamous and notorious personages as Adolf Hitler, did intend to deliver a wicked thought of one Europe.
Chabot stated that this revolution involves the solidification of a European market of goods and services, major structural changes in countries plagued by fiscal negligence, and the reorganization of monetary policy in some of the world’s most advanced industrialized economies. The “European Single Market” is “the world’s largest domestic market”.
As part of the enlargement process for the now 25-member European Union, its membership is expected to expand to 30 or 35 by 2020, with the western Balkan countries as the final joiners (Batora, 2007). The idea may be hinged on the dictum that there is strength in numbers. This actually gives expression to the founding philosophy of EU.
This piece discusses that these are not insurmountable problems and stresses that the main difficulties from the enlargement may have arisen from the effective inclusion of the Eastern European countries into the Single Market, the microeconomic hub of the EU.
It requires a store location where customer base will be good – sufficient number of economically progressive individuals, who will fuel demand for supermarket retail services and commodities. Location should be preferably urban
As the paper discusses the Union decided to go for a monetary and economic union in 1992 that included the use of a single currency in Europe. The move however took ten years to become a reality and in 2002 national currencies were replaced by euro notes. The Union has established itself as a pace setter.
Copenhagen Criteria as well as the treaty Maastricht outlines the criterion for accession which also depends on the political evaluation by the institutions of EU. Currently, five countries are considered candidates for EU
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Enlargement of European Union for FREE!