It is difficult to explain America's involvement in the Vietnam War. On the face of it, the Americans had overwhelming advantages to press home a victory. However, the outcome was defeat. The Americans had the man power, the best in technology, the latest firepower, aircraft carriers, armory and other weapons…
It is not the actual military defeat that hurt. It was the emotional defeat, the defeat of intelligence, the political defeat, the defeat of calculation, the defeat of the entire plan and purpose of the war that so staggered the nation that it is still trying to come to terms with the questions of the war to which different analysts are providing different answers (Mackubin Thomas Owens).
Probably the best person to answer the Vietnam question was Ngo Dinh Diem who capably led the charge of South Vietnam. Like John F Kennedy, Diem too was a Roman Catholic. He successfully kept communism under control, sometimes brutally. However, in the process he angered the Buddhist monks who were part of the majority in Vietnam. He was seen as a protg of the Americans and he behaved like one. Nevertheless, as time went on, he was becoming increasingly isolated because of fears by some including the United States ambassador to Vietnam, Henry Cabot Lodge that he was leading a corrupt regime. The failure of the American intelligence to track the correct course and keep at it grated the final nail to the coffin with a very big hammer. Now the Americans are coming to realize that Diem was not such a bad fellow after all (Mackubin Thomas Owens).
Journalists David Halberstam and Neil Sheehan depicted Diem in the most debilitating terms. Their account of Diem was so horrifying and unpleasant that a 1963 congressional mission described them as "arrogant, emotional, unobjective and ill-informed." One cannot fault Halberstam and Sheehan though. They were only faithfully and unwittingly reproducing what was fed to them through obliging Vietnamese sources who were secretly communist agents themselves (Mackubin Thomas Owens).
Diem depended on the Americans to carry out his agenda of blocking the communists. He signed a joint communiqu with President Eisenhower condemning communism (Dr. Penelope Nicholson). Diem complemented the policies of the United States quite well in Vietnem. However, the American politicians were not happy with Diem. They did not want a Catholic running amok amidst the predominant Buddhist population. They found fault with his government capturing and killing communist insurgents. They wavered in backing him on long term basis fearing he was increasingly becoming a liability and must be isolated. The fault lines in the American intelligence were undermining a factor that was actually providing them positive results in the war. The intrigue took its toll. Diem was assassinated in a coup by his senior military officers in 1963. Kennedy was unnerved by the assassination of Diem although he approved of the coup.
After the assassination of Diem the question of leadership haunted Vietnam. Any leader who took up the reins had to have the backing of the Americans. But the policy decisions for Vietnam came from ...
Cite this document
(“War in Vietnam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/301907-war-in-vietnam
(War in Vietnam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words - 1)
“War in Vietnam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/301907-war-in-vietnam.
The rebel forces were able to overcome the French in the initial stages of the conflict. Consequently, the two parties opted to settle the conflict via an accord. However, the American government failed to recognize the pact. Therefore, the American government took over the conflict in Vietnam.
The U.S government takes a central purpose of undertaking relations with other counties around the world, thereby becoming a sovereign country, and acquiring authority over territories. Conducting of various relationships by America their allies has depended significantly on foreign policy.
Body bags containing the remains of young American soldiers killed in the war started streaming in. The cost of funding the war spiraled into millions of dollars per day drawing the ire mainly of the poor. On the other hand, American troops started massacring the very people they were there to protect and perpetrating heinous crimes against humanity, notably the Ma Lai massacre.
For the entire 20th century, he estimates 130-142 million war-related deaths and a chilling 214-226 million if government killings in non-war situations are included." In the 1950s, the globe averaged 13 wars each year. In the 1960s, the globe averaged 19 wars each year.
For the millions of Americans it signed a certain turnover point in society, a form of a deep social and psychological crisis. However, prior to the beginning of the large-scale war in the early 1965, the situation in the United States was quite different, with both Congress and public opinion supporting the war3.
Significant numbers of women served admirably in all branches of the service, as professional nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, air traffic controllers, aerial reconnaissance photographers, intelligence and language specialists, legal officers, and even in security and administrative positions.
ted States did not win the war for the first time in its history while Vietnam War was generally observed as the battlefield of Cold War between the USA and the USSR2. For the millions of Americans it signed a certain turnover point in society, a form of a deep social and
ot clear is the main goal and benefit that the US would have obtained for fighting the war and was it really unnecessary, immoral or illegitimate to fight in Vietnam? In fact, it is argued that it was the first time that the war exposed the United States government for their
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic War in Vietnam for FREE!