While many believe that public opinion can and does matter to policy makers, others contend that public opinion complicates or is of relative importance to policy making.
If the issue is of great importance to the public and there is a common consensus as to how the problem may be resolved between a majority of the public and policy makers, policy makers are likely to be facilitated in their foreign policy aims. The most recent and significant example of this is the US incursion into Iraq in 2003. When an issue is of lesser importance, resulting in a less educated public, the policy making process can be complicated. Needless to say foreign policy making is the most difficult when it concerns issues of great importance and little common consensus.
To ensure political success, presidents and other policy makers must use an understanding of public attitudes to structure their foreign policies for presentation to their constituents. Public opinion is not as malleable as some believe it to be. We only have to point to various examples of American politicians attempting to coerce public opinion on issues that are unpopular with the American public and their lack of success in doing so.
One of the major underpinnings of representative democracy is the belief that government policy, both foreign and domestic, is controlled by public opinion and the power of the vote. Whether or not this is a reality with regards to foreign policy has been a question of debate between various theories of international relations over the course of the twentieth century. While most students of the topic admit that public opinion can have some sort of affect on military, economic and political practices abroad, the extent of this impact is fiercely debated, most notably by the realist and liberal camps.
Realist theory claims that public opinion is unpredictable and ever changing. Because foreign policy often has its affect in places that are so far removed geographically public opinion has an irrational edge to it. Although Realists do admit that public opinion can have a considerable impact on foreign policy making in democracies, it is for this reason that it is most often "erratic and incoherent" and they conclude that "a good foreign policy is incompatible with the democratic process and therefore the decision-making process should be isolated from the vagaries of public opinion." 1 Foreign policy is far too remote and complex in its issues and very often the public is not well informed enough for it to respond rationally.
From the liberal point of view public opinion is seen as a positive element which could bring about a more reasonable and peaceful foreign policy.
Cite this document
(“US Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Coursework”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/304132-us-public-opinion-and-foreign-policy
(US Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Coursework)
“US Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Coursework”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/304132-us-public-opinion-and-foreign-policy.
Cited: 0 times
Intricately tied to all forms of representative democracy is the belief that the public has a say in policy decisions made by its government. Elected officials represent the voter's opinions and desires and will be held accountable during elections. …
This means that some public companies have private ownership. Forming a public company requires that there be a minimum of two directors. The company’s directors should meet the legal obligations and requirements as set by the law. Another requirement while starting a public company is that there should be a minimum share capital.
This conflict, which has resulted into violence, has greatly affected the region’s development. It has affected the region’s tourism industry that has been the major economic activity. Many people have shown their interest in the process of peace recovering.
Each of these approaches has its own strength and advantages but all four fail to recognize that any attempt to use policy networks as an explanatory variable involves three dialectical relationships - one between structure and agency, another between network and context, and the third relationship between network and outcome (Ibid).
In 2005, China attracted 18 percent of the US$334bn total FDI flowing into the developing economies (UNCTAD, 2006). Over the past two decades, there have been significant changes in the sectoral distribution of FDI in China. In the early 1980s, a large part of FDI in China was directed to geological prospecting, real estate and tourism.
of the government that relate to the welfare of the people such as education and health policies, information about public security and eminent threats that should be brought to the public’s attention, and issues affecting civil servants.
Technology is the vehicle through
Political process refers to the system of belief about patterns of political institutions and interaction. It plays a huge role in the prediction of political phenomena. It is a conglomerate of beliefs
This is because they are the lawmakers, and the public depends on them to make and pass laws that benefit the public. Not all policies suggested are enacted into law due to the voting procedure conducted in
The author states that public health interventions at policy levels are majorly concerned with regulations and resource allocations through formulation of evidence-based plans of actions which are continuously assessed and implemented through qualitative and quantitative evidence. Public health interventions at community levels.
2 pages (500 words)Coursework
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Coursework on topic US Public Opinion and Foreign Policy for FREE!