Parliamentary and Presidential System

Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 0
The Parliamentary system or Presidential System are two most important governance systems in the world which are effectively in place in most of the countries.In Parliamentary system, executive is directly or indirectly dependent on the legislature whereas in Presidential System of governance, the executive branch exists and presides separately from the legislature…


The main difference between both the systems of governance is the fact that under Parliamentary System, the Chief Executive of the country is accountable and responsible to the legislature and has the power to dismiss him whereas in case of Presidential System, the Chief Executive of the State is not accountable to legislature and in normal circumstances can not dismiss the head of the State. “The president is elected directly by the people and is answerable to the voters rather than the legislature. Whereas the prime minister has no choice because he or she is a Member of Parliament and is directly accountable to that body. Herein lies a very basic difference between the presidential system of government as it exists in the United States and the parliamentary system that has evolved in Great Britain.” Therefore the Parliamentary System is more accountable than the Presidential System because of the fact that Sepration of powers is not allowed under the Parliamentary System and the Prime Minister, being the member of the Parliament is answerable to it. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Personal Happiness: More than Money
Rather, the general happiness of an individual is comprised of several components, most of which are not found in a large bank account. In fact, one social scientist named A. H. Maslow theorized that humans have several classes of needs, one built upon another; basic physiological needs, the need for safety and security, the need to love and be loved, needs in the area of esteem, and the need for…
2 pages (502 words)
People are more knowledgeable today and therefore have more opportunities and choices than they had in the past, do you agree
Due to change people now have more opportunities and choices than they had in the past.…
4 pages (1004 words)
The point of making people and organizations more accountable
This is because there are the stakeholders who need current information on the status of their concerns. For example, in an international session that looked at accountability across all sectors involved in HIV, including community, government and UN, a reporter reported that -…
6 pages (1506 words)
Aboriginal people and the Canadian justice system
Section 35 of the constitution of Canada defines aborigines as 'aboriginal people in Canada include the Indian, Inuit, and metis people of Canada And further sect 35 sub sec 4 states 'notwithstanding any other provision of this act, the aboriginal and treaty rights referred to in sub section 1 are guaranteed equally to male and female.The Federal government of Canada and the provincial government…
6 pages (1506 words)
UK parliamentary system or USA ?
The fact that he is not subjected to the legislature in the selection means that he can choose wise men and women with extensive experience (Pushparaj web).…
1 pages (251 words)
Why are some people more inclined to be victims of crime than others? Is it their home location, their actions, or is there some other reason that they may be attractive targets (more so than other people) to criminals?
According to Tischler (1990) the gender of an individual determines the likelihood of being assaulted by criminals and the nature of the crime (Tischler, 1990). For example, the available data on crime statistics indicates that more males are victims of serious crimes than females. In addition, females are more likely to be involved in sexual crimes and experience attacked by people they know.…
2 pages (502 words)