The main difference between both the systems of governance is the fact that under Parliamentary System, the Chief Executive of the country is accountable and responsible to the legislature and has the power to dismiss him whereas in case of Presidential System, the Chief Executive of the State is not accountable to legislature and in normal circumstances can not dismiss the head of the State. “The president is elected directly by the people and is answerable to the voters rather than the legislature. Whereas the prime minister has no choice because he or she is a Member of Parliament and is directly accountable to that body. Herein lies a very basic difference between the presidential system of government as it exists in the United States and the parliamentary system that has evolved in Great Britain.” Therefore the Parliamentary System is more accountable than the Presidential System because of the fact that Sepration of powers is not allowed under the Parliamentary System and the Prime Minister, being the member of the Parliament is answerable to it. ...Show more
The Parliamentary system or Presidential System are two most important governance systems in the world which are effectively in place in most of the countries.In Parliamentary system, executive is directly or indirectly dependent on the legislature whereas in Presidential System of governance, the executive branch exists and presides separately from the legislature…
According to the study since both parliamentary system and presidential system are the subcategories of democracy, judiciary is functioning independently in both in order to ensure justice to all. Parliamentary system cannot function against the will of the public whereas in presidential system the government can function even against the will of the public.
The subject involving the topic which is a better government has been the subject of debates for centuries now by mostly all of countries in the entire world. Several discussions have raised the following issues
Comparison between presidential and parliamentary forms of governments In recent times, the debate regarding which system of governance is better for a particular nation has been a feature of political discussions in many parts of the world. With rising awareness among peoples of different parts of the earth, there is a tendency towards questioning the ways in which the lives of people are governed at a political level.
Statute as a power of the political leaders is limited by the rule of law. The government itself must act under law: its will is not irresponsible and arbitrary.
In both systems, a central aspect of the pluralization of politics is dispersion of power. "Parliamentary systems are typified by a fusion of powers between the legislative and executive branches.
In some governments, the president is elected democratically by the electorates while in others the president is a monarch who inherits power from past generations. The system of government in place determines the allocation of state
This had led to conflicts of many kinds in many nations where the very concept of a nation has been sought to be rethought. The importance of such questions is greater in third world countries which have
In a bid to understand these two systems, this essay will compare and contrast the two structures of governance. It will also explore the variances that exist in the relationship between the executive, legislature, and the judiciary in the two systems.
8 pages (2000 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org