There are a number of stands that can be taken from this argument but the most convincing one when looked at from a neutral angle is that those who are criticizing religion with regard to ecological factors are highly misguided. Religion does not have any effect on the environmental crisis being faced by the world. Granted there are a number of pointers that can be used to argue the fact that religion does indeed have an effect on the environmental crisis, and an individual may be able to use these pointers to lay out their case but the inclusion of technology and the progress that has been made in terms of information means that one cannot look at religion as the main source of the environmental crisis. In order to prove this however one will need to look at both sides of the case in order to determine that their case is the actual reality. That is to say, one will need to look at those arguing for as well as those arguing against the fact that religion does not have an effect on the environmental crisis (Veeraraj 34). It can be said that this argument first arose as a result of the fact that religion has over the years played a major role in the manner that society conducts itself. The religion of a people more often than not dictates the way in which the people act by having an influence on the customs and culture of that particular group of people (Watling 55). Thus it can be said that even the manner in which they treat the environment is as a result of a subtle influence from their religion. There are a number of individuals who have looked at cases that can be said to be similar to this one such as Lynn White. Lynn White advocated for the argument that Christianity if traced backed historically, can be said to be responsible for the environmental crisis that has affected the world lately. The main basis of the argument behind this claim is that this religion has set itself up in a manner that puts man as the dominant being over his surrounding and thus he is able to do as he pleases with the environment. Instead of taking the role of a caretaker to their surroundings, Christianity is said to place man in an authoritative position allowing him to put his needs ahead of the environment as their surroundings as seen as a source provided to them from where they shall get all their needs (Watling 23). Lynn White also argues that since the problem can be said to come from religious origins, then the solution should also be of the same nature if one is to succeed in dealing with the environmental crisis. Parts of the bible have been used to lay basis to the claim that religion is behind the cause of the environmental crisis such as sections of Genesis (Merritt Pg45). Genesis describes the story behind the creation of the world and in the book man is given a special position over the others. Those arguing for the case that religion is behind the crisis have claimed that Genesis puts man to be the main creation of God and the environment as the home that was set up for man’s pleasure (Veeraraj 52). This has apparently led the society to treat their environment as a play ground and have barely taken proper care of it. A round up of the argument can be said that the case is based on the position that the manner in which religion places human beings above all other living things in the world has led to people taking the environment for granted and as a result have began to exploit it. This is not true however as a number of
Religion and the environment have been two of the most constant factors that can be found in man’s existence and thus it should not come as much of a surprise when the two were thrown together in relation to one having an effect on the other. …
The question of nature’s spirituality reaches far beyond theoretical ethical debates. Decision making in various industries and individual lives is profoundly influenced by the role of nature in human worldview. As religious doctrines are diverse and assign different roles to the elements of environment, it is argued here that the value of nature should be separated from divine forces.
The Hindu, Christian and Buddhist women have long worked for the development of the ecological sustainability. These women have commonly contributed to these developments as their religious traditions and the evolution of the world directs them towards the ecological sustainability and their role in the development of the ecology.
One needs to understand here that no society can prosper which only focuses on one-sided domination. Therefore a system needs to be developed that amalgamates both these movements so that a radical primary socioeconomic system is established.
In so doing, the religions are now entering their ecological phase.” Religion gives the environment a divine nature a factor that enriches environmental activism. Since religion is the most binding authority over all humans, it is the best yardstick for addressing environmental concern.
A crisis can also be observed in a situation where predation pressure arises thus affecting the continued survival of the species. An ecological crisis cannot be avoided because of technological advancement and more improved ways of scientific approaches that are up coming.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the questions that are raised by the connections between religion and ecology and how this plays fundamental part in how human view the nature. It will explore the interaction between human species and other
Therefore a system needs to be developed that amalgamates both these movements so that a radical primary socioeconomic system is established.
Ecofeminist have different perspectives and argue on various basic concepts that