This essay Debate on Relativism and the Absolute Truthtalks that people tend to run after the fall of an idea by subjecting the idea to numerous criticisms. In the early centuries, before the advent of scientific theories, the society relied on the religious perspectives. …
This discussion stresses that many people, across various cultures, in the world have various notions about what they perceive to be true. On one hand, fundamental theologians advocate for the absolute truth. On the second side, the proponent of neo-modern ethics tends to question the traditional version about truth. Theologians and other theorists have taken the trouble of analyzing relativism with respect to the religious teachings. The puzzle emanates from the convictions built by a given society against certain morals. For instance, the scientific theories and the religious teaching about the existence of God do leads to many questions. A person may take a wild imagination about the existence of God, leading to a theory about the same. The consequence of such action would be emergence of a given theory.
This paper makes a conclusion that one cannot preach the gospel while arguing on a middle ground. This view tends to suggest that a Christian teaching or a given notion belong to one of the two sides: absolute truth or wrong. For example, when a person falls in water, it is evident that the person would be wet. This outcome does not give any room for meddling between the person coming out of water when dry and the person coming out of water when wet. The revelation of the above action enables us to argue that absolute truth exists. While this appears to be so, many people tend argue or stagger when issues regarding Christianity are mentioned. For instance, how much truth should a Christian accept in relation to certain principle in Christianity. ...
Cite this document
(“Debate on Relativism and the Absolute Truth Research Paper - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/religion-and-theology/521145-debate-on-relativism-and-the-absolute-truth
(Debate on Relativism and the Absolute Truth Research Paper - 1)
“Debate on Relativism and the Absolute Truth Research Paper - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/religion-and-theology/521145-debate-on-relativism-and-the-absolute-truth.
That means the validity of these things depends on the culture and context they originate. In sharp contrast to this view that the intelligentsia cherished for quite some time, Goodman (2010) claims that there are some basic ‘wrongs’ which are universally accepted as wrongs and are not bound by regional or cultural contexts.
An example is that of a lecturer who may woo his or her students, though the lecturer knows or believes that with good reason that the pursuit and even more the attainment of this end will cost the lecturer career livelihood, destroy his or her marriage, alienate his or her children and friends and in other ways ruin their lives.
The validity of the actions a person performs or exhibits is culture specific. The right and wrong is culture bound which means that something that is considered moral in one society maybe absolutely immoral in another society. In other words cultural relativism “is the idea that each culture or ethnic group is to be evaluated on the basis of its own values and norms of behavior and not on the basis of those of another culture or ethnic group” (Rosado, 1994).
Morality outlines that which the society has generally accepted and consequently perceives it to be right. Definition of morality varies across social groups, and what is perceived to be right in one society may be wrong to another. In other words, the morals of one society may constitute immorality to another.
According to Ashley and Boehlke (2012), the history of gambling in United States is marked by early recognition and tolerance to prohibition to pervasive propagation. Some individuals consider gambling as a leisure activity in which they can relax and have fun.
The author states that ethical relativism is a viewpoint where there is the belief that morality is dependent on the norms of a culture that practice it; this society determines whether the actions of individuals in morally right or wrong. Those who propagate this theory believe that nothing can be said to be the absolute truth concerning morality.
Seemingly, there seems to be a shift in our thinking, culture and a sort of change in attitude of how we view gays and lesbians today. Today, people are more open about there sexual orientation and therefore it has become more acceptable these days.
A discussion between two characters- About moral relativism Ethics, a set of rules in a society that regulates people’s behaviour by defining wrongs and rights in a society, is a fundamental aspect of people’s behaviour. Different ethical theories exist to explain people’s behaviours and to offer general rules towards a more cohesive society.
They attempt to place emphasis on morality through analyzing the secular and rational mindset as perceived by human welling or happiness. Philosophical approach is not authoritarian, irrational or arbitrary (William 23). The religious and legal laws are subjective.
This paper illustrates that if some person is blind one may not be able to accept the absolute truth that, that pet is a cat because one has never seen a cat. In other scenarios, consider a person who is mentally challenged. Again such persons experience and perception of absolute truth in the physical world may not match with others who think what we call normal.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Debate on Relativism and the Absolute Truth for FREE!