Please boost your Plan to download papers
Assess any ONE or TWO modern interpretations of the doctrine of original sin
Religion and Theology
Pages 8 (2008 words)
Modern Interpretations of the Doctrine of Original Sin The doctrine of original sin as articulated by early Christianity advanced the idea that humanity inherits sins from Adam and Eve from which mankind must seek redemption. Modern Christians however, have challenged the concept that a man can be born bearing responsibility for the sins of another…
3). Modern interpretations of the doctrine of original sin typically come to the conclusion that given the involuntary nature of inherited sin, it is reasonable to conclude that sin is not necessarily an evil or moral wrong, but also an explanation for the correct path to follow (Couehoven, 2009, p. 567). Modern philosophers such as Emmanuel Kant set the stage for later expansions on the interpretations of the doctrine of original sin. Kant argued that sin is connected to an individual’s will. In this regard, an individual sins when the individual acts on impulse as opposed to rational reasoning. The freedom to choose between impulse and rational reasoning is the origins of sin (Hastings & Selbie, 2003, p. 563). Modern philosopher G.W.F. Hegel also argued that the doctrine of original sin merely recognizes that man can only be presumed to have the potential to be good and that man is not naturally good (Hastings & Selbie, 2003, p. 563). Modern interpretations of the doctrine of original sin have focused on attempts to understand and conceptualize sin. For example Gustafson, in his conceptualization of sin argues that sin is “an ancient religious symbol”, therefore suggesting that sin is an inherited phenomenon (Gustafson, 1977, p. 156). ...
Not exactly what you need?