Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

A Critical Comparison between Laozi’s and Zhuangzi’s Views about Daoism - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : dmosciski

Summary

Lao Tzu (often known as Laozi) and Chuang Tzu (often called as Zhuanzi) are two important figures in the Chinese philosophy of Daoism. Both of these philosophers Tao or Dao is the Way how the universe works…

Extract of sample
A Critical Comparison between Laozi’s and Zhuangzi’s Views about Daoism

Lao Tzu (often known as Laozi) and Chuang Tzu (often called as Zhuanzi) are two important figures in the Chinese philosophy of Daoism. Both of these philosophers Tao or Dao is the Way how the universe works. In another words, they believed that “Tao is the universal law of nature” (Ivanhoe & Norden 165). Scholars claim that these philosophers shared many similar concepts regarding the philosophy of Tao. But though these philosophers commonly believed so, they differ from each other to a great extent.Being a successor of Laozi, Zhuangzi have made a significant effort to provide explanations of Laozi’s thoughts and beliefs. He explained Laozi’s thoughts through concrete instances from history, people’s life, and also from his surroundings. But most often, Zhuangzi’s elucidations appear most complex and complicated. Sometimes, they become diverted the mainstream of Daoism and tend to appear as an individual philosophic strand. The most remarkable difference between the two is how they view ‘Tao’ or the Way. Both of them believe that the Way is beyond human perception and conception. In this regard, both of them are realists. But Zhuangzi’s approach to Tao or the Way is more applicable to human life than Laozi’s. That is, Laozi is more metaphysical than Zhuangzi. Since Laozi’s philosophy fails to dispel the transcendence of the Way or Tao, his teachings do not care much about human life as Zhuangzi’s teachings do. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

not sure
This entails display of excellent characters thus, promoting human virtues. Confucians have an optimistic view of humankind. They believe in the possibility of the ordinary man to become awe- inspiring and thus, man is teachable, perfectible, and improvable. This is achievable through personal as well as communal endeavors and is possible by self-creation and self-cultivation. Moreover, it focuses on cultivation of virtues such as ren, yi and li (Juergensmeyer, 70). Ren advocates for humaneness and altruism for people in the society, yi advocates for moral disposition to shun evil and…
4 pages (1004 words)
i'm not sure
Taoist beliefs are a way of life including ways of your daily activities i.e. meditation, breathing, diet, use of natural materials. Taoism is all about staying aligned with the natural and basic way of life which the humans have gotten far away from, it’s about the natural cycle of our life system and planet. Both Taoist and Confucian beliefs share the same meaning, they have co-existed in China for over 2000 years. Both of these started as philosophies and turned into religious beliefs. The difference between Taoism and Confucianism is that one relates itself with the search of meaning and…
4 pages (1004 words)
I'm not sure
In addition to honoring elders, the path to virtue is found through restraint. This means that the individual must not indulge for personal satisfaction in order to stay on the path that will bring him/her to higher levels of achievement. When the individual behaves in a manner that expresses his/her position on the path as he/she is following the Way, the development of the community is achieved through right and moral good which in turn contributes to social betterment. Finding the Way is the path to finding virtue. The term virtue refers to moral worthiness, specifically and is referring to…
5 pages (1255 words)
I'M NOT SURE
One of the things outsiders are most interested in is the philosophies. Thus, names like Laozi and Zhuangzi are now better known than before. This paper shall focus on the philosophies of these two, hitherto, less known philosophers. In the paper I shall explain their philosophies, draw comparisons and contrasts, and then endeavor to point out the superior philosophy among the two. Laozi was born and died during the reign of the Zhou dynasty. He was a firm believer in Taoism. He was a philosopher in then ancient China. His best work was the Tao Te Ching. This has led to him variously to be…
5 pages (1255 words)
not sure
This is based on the fact that it is the responsibility of leaders to protect and care for their subjects, failure to do so, they desist from becoming leaders. Laozi on the other hand believes on a cautious approach, insisting on taking a spiritual approach in problems of governance within a state (Raz, 91). Looking at these different approaches in their philosophical views, this paper analyzes their differences, similarities, and concludes by taking a position on which is the best form of Daoism. Laozi believes that it is impossible to see, hear, feel or name the Dao. He believes that Dao…
4 pages (1004 words)
I'M NOT SURE
Mencius also believed that person has power to determine his or her destiny and taught his followers to practice righteousness and uphold justice (Mengzi & Bryan, 44). In his emphasis for practicing morality and ethics, Mencius believed that a ruler who does not listen to the demands of his or her subjects deserves death (Zhuangzi & Chuang-Tzu, 43). He disliked violent leaders and emphasized on respect of all people from their leaders. His moral teachings and practice for uprightness to all people made Mencius a strong follower of Confucius than any other follower before or after him.…
3 pages (753 words)
I'm not sure
Xunzi departs from the ideas of Confucius and Mencius in the view of heaven (Ivanhoe and Bryan 41). He argues that heaven is nothing more than the natural world which has no moral will and that its activities are totally different to human activities. Therefore, human-beings are responsible for their own destinies and they must not think that heaven can intervene or be in control of their own troubles. He says that heaven is responsible for how things are and not how they ought to be. People must therefore live with the effects and limitations imposed on them by heaven and earth (Ivanhoe and…
3 pages (753 words)