All materials presented in this paper will come from class notes and a secondary source. Logical Problem of Evil Atheist J.L Mackie presented this argument where he argued that there is a contradiction between the existence of God and the existence of evil (Kelly 218). Mackie formulated his argument that there seems to be an evident contradiction between four main premises. One of them is that God is an omnipotent (Kelly 219). This premise translates that God is all-powerful, meaning that he is supposed to have the power of eliminating all evil that exists in this world (Meister 132). The second premise is that God is an omniscient. This second premise translates that God is all-knowing, meaning that he could have the ability to detect the occurrence and existence of evil in order to prevent or eliminate it. The third premise according to Mackie is that God is Omni-benevolent (Meister 132). This argument translates that God is all-good, meaning he would have the will to prevent all the evils from happening in this world (Meister 132). The fourth premise indicates that evil and suffering exists in this world (Meister 132). This premise translates that there is evidence of moral and natural evil existence in this world. Reflecting on all of the above four premises Mackie concluded that God does not exist. The above four premises leads to a contradiction between the existence if evil and God. This derives to a point that God does not exist. For example, it is easy to reject the premise that God is omnipotent. This is because if God is not able to stop evil and most importantly know before it occurs in order to do something to stop it, then probably there is no God. There is also a possibility to reject the second premise; God is omniscient, by stating that if God is really all knowing, he could have the ability to stop evil. The above information indicates that no one is able to know what individuals can do even God himself. Moreover, this means that if God does exist, evil occurs and surprises even him. It is also possible to reject the third premise indicating that God is Omni-benevolent. This is because if God is perfect good, he ought to have the ability of knowing when evil might occur and then have the power to stop it. However, it seems that God does not care about evil and possible he does not have the ability to stop it. Rejecting the first three premises translates into the fourth one, evil and suffering exists, and therefore giving a possible conclusion that there is no God. The Evidential Argument One of the well-known individuals who have firmly supported the evidential argument is William Rowe (Kelly 220). Through the evidential argument, Rowe and many other philosophers argue that much of the evils that people experiences in this world seem to be pointless. Rowe presented his arguments on four main statements. One of the statements indicated “E”, is an evil that no one established its justifier. However, many people especially philosophers have been trying to find the justifier without any success. The second statement according to Rowe shows there is a high probability “E” has no justifier. The third statement indicates that if there are some evil that depict to have no justifier, then all the facts presented on theism about God depicts to be false (Meister 135). The fourth statement as presented by Rowe then concludes there is a high probability that theism is false. According the above statements
Name Professor Course Date The Logical and Evidential Problem of Evil Logical and Evidential problem of evil are both the main arguments that tend to question the existence of God. Both of the two arguments are presented in order to show there is no possibility of existence of God considering how evil have affected the world…
“Does God Exist?” This is one of the most important questions that each one of us has asked ourselves at one point or another. Theists and atheists, philosophers and theologians, scientists and logicians have all tried to answer this question.
The evil exists, therefore, an omnipotent, benevolent and omnipotent entity does not exist either. There are two arguments on the evil or problem of evil. They include logical and evidential arguments. The logical problem of evil This argument purports or tends to show a logical inconsistency between Gods existence and evil existence.
The Logical Argument Logical problem consists in the consideration that the existence of evil human beings experience questions the existence of the perfect God (Michael 320). This is because some people ask why God permits various bad and horrible things to happen.
If God were omniscient, He is well-aware of all the terrible things that happen. If God were omnipotent, He would be able to do something about all that is evil. Moreover, if God were morally perfect, He would have done everything in His power to prevent all that is not good.
This paper explores the concept of the problem of evil. The problem of evil arises from the scope of nature that identifies conflicting theories in existence of evil. This is because a consideration of the nature of God and His power should not allow evil to prevail, or should at least be able to eliminate evil.
It is therefore particularly difficult to understand the existence of evil, a rebellious force against God’s plans, and His creation, in an environment in which God’s power is believed to be supreme. It is for example expected that as light drives away darkness, God’s power eliminate evil.
However, considering the extent and aptitude of suffering evident in the world, there is need to determine whether it results from inhumanity or natural disaster (Kibler, 2004). Nonetheless, there is not ample evidence to approve or disapprove that God exist.
d may be ethereal and unique to every individual yet there are more common factors in a definition of God across religions and cultures as compared to a definition of evil. Moreover, even the existence of evil leads to debate, since there are those who suggest that a benevolent
To logically prove the existence of God, we will use the four different forms of the argument from evil: argument from imperfection, argument from natural evil, argument from moral evil, and argument from unbelief.
1 pages (250 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org