With this basic assumption, it is no wonder that Mantis further informs that the media, which is owned by a select few people, actually controls most of the national dailies, periodicals, TV stations and film studios. It, therefore, reflects the ideologies and perceptions of the affluent class, to which it belongs and not of the masses to which it caters for. According to him, the media has been projecting the interests of the riches in the garb of public interest. He believes that the interests of the minorities and the underprivileged have been sidelined to the extent that they have just been reduced to statistics that appears only occasionally. The major organizing ideas of the paper being that media has misused its power of representation of issues and priorities and American society is very class conscious. Consequently, the socio-political role of the poor and the minority has been marginalized so much so, that either they have become ‘faceless identities’ or undeserving social outcasts. It is one of the ironies of modern times that the general public is still gullible enough to be taken in by the media blitz and rejoices in the exploits of the rich and the powerful!
Larew, on the hand, explores the influence of upper class in the academic sphere and exposes the biases of the elite universities and colleges that go beyond the academics. He says that all the premium academic institutes of the country like Harvard University, Pennsylvania University, Yales etc. have admission seats reserved for the children of alumni, irrespective of the fact of whether they actually deserve it or not. The explanation for the preferential treatment is that their privileged background makes them ‘smarter’ because their parents ‘encourage learning’.