The Government outlines the individual rights and freedoms in the constitution, which comprise a set of guidelines to govern the people. Thus, individual liberty needs a basis in law, but additionally, it must integrate the requirements of social order. This means that maintenance of law and order balances with individual freedom to guard and define the sphere of liberty of the individual and promote order in the society. Despite, democratic governments supporting the importance of freedom, they must put limits on individual freedoms. In this regard, provisions should forbid those deeds that would cause panic or harm for the general good. By this, the government ensure that it maintains law and order and at the same time offering individual freedom. In the United States, there is limitation of individual liberty to guard citizens from one another, to guarantee order in society and to uphold the common interests of the society. Therefore, the law must permit the sensible exercise of freedoms.The Government can also strike this balance by supporting the social systems in the society that realize the goals of freedom and order. Fagin (2007) asserts that the society uses numerous strategies to attain these goals, including social standards imposed through the social forces of the family, government, religion and school. Through these social institutions, people learn the principles and requirements for good behavior and receive punishment when they infringe these social standards.
Cite this document
(“Governments Balance Law and Order with Individual Freedom Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/38516-how-governments-should-balance-law-and-order-with
(Governments Balance Law and Order With Individual Freedom Essay)
“Governments Balance Law and Order With Individual Freedom Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/38516-how-governments-should-balance-law-and-order-with.
Cited: 0 times
Most governments have difficulties in balancing law and order with individual freedoms. The writer of the present essay suggests that the reasons for such issue is that most people believe that the government should not interfere with individual freedoms…
Acknowledgements Table of Contents Introduction 4 II. A Review of Literature 5 III. The Law of Defamation 9 A.Overview 9 IV. Analysis 19 V. Conclusion 21 Bibliography 22 Introduction We currently live in a tumultuous era with the threat of terrorism, war, the proliferation of nuclear weapons and any number of other issues to which the public seeks information.
The first article of United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights sets the boundaries of this personal freedom in these words, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” (UN, 1948).
The offenders were treated harshly and their rights were violated. They were also subjected to torturous punishments. As a result, there was a great imbalance between the administration of justice and security. Things have changed in the 21st century because of the evolution of security and justice.
This essay concerns the freedom of human. When we actually get the balance between social order, personal freedom and ecological integrity correctly, the vast majority of people can live happily with individual freedom and minimal constraints. Our freedom together with constraints are formalized into kind of long agreement.
With the increase in global interconnectedness, the scope of strategic policy choices available to individual governments and the effectiveness of many traditional policy instruments tends to decline" (Held and McGrew 2003: 13). I. Introduction Globalization has become a major trend in most parts of the world, especially with most countries accepting globalization processes in their political and economic activities.
The author states that in contrast with traditional viruses such as smallpox and poliomyelitis, new viruses of fearful scope have now appeared. HIV/AIDS and avian influenza are the main threats to safety and existence of mankind. The threat can be explained by the fact that the alterations of mutation could have evolved their own genetic structure.
The state’s control over society and public order is through the medium of criminal justice (Lin & Keith, 2006). Public order is directly related to the rule of law. There is increasing concern about public safety in western democracies especially post-September 11.
But within this wilderness area,a portion of the forest road which traversed land traditionally used by Native Americans for religious practices. This caused a cultural conflict between Indian religious activity and Forest Service management practices. The
For a free society, as is prevalent in almost all countries across the globe, it is expected that privacy be considered as essential for each individual. However with the advancements of technology and communications, it
sment, persecution, sometimes even groundless imprisonment and violence due to their creed, beliefs or, on the contrary, disbelief in the existence of God or gods. Numerous places of worship are burned to the ground and cemeteries are destroyed (Bielefeldt, 2012, p. 20).
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Governments Balance Law and Order with Individual Freedom for FREE!