Moreover, many others believe that America should reassess its strategy from a realistic point of view to extricate itself from the conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq to concentrate on the wider aspects of the war on terrorism.
Now the question is how a country can attack another country without convincing reasons? Moreover, why the rest of the world keeping silence even when two sovereign states attacked by a superpower? How can the idealism of spreading democracy with the help of war be justified? Is it necessary for America to take a more pragmatic approach in fighting against terrorism? This paper tries to find answers to above question with the help of analysis of the war on terror both in Iraq and Afghanistan in a realistic point of view.
America’s war on terror strategies lacks consistency and a proper shape. While it engages in an all-out attack in Iraq, it uses targeted attacks in specific areas in Afghanistan. The reasons cited for attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan are entirely different. In Iraq, America accused that the president Saddam itself is leading the terrorist networks whereas in Afghanistan they had no such worries. In Afghanistan, America is getting support from the administration in their efforts to eliminate the Taliban led terrorist groups.
Mearsheimer (2005) has argued that Hans Joachim Morgenthau, one of the most important political thinkers of the 20th century and one of the great realist thinkers of all time has opposed the Vietnam War and he would have opposed the current war on terror also on same grounds. Mearsheimer has also mentioned that the dispute about whether to go to war in Iraq was between two competing theories of international politics: realism and the neo-conservatism that underpins the Bush doctrine (Mearsheimer). Many people now suspect that President Bush has certainly hidden agendas in conducting the war on terror.
Cite this document
(“The American War on Terror in Afghanistan Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/391500-case-study-on-the-american-war-on-terror-in-afghanistan
(The American War on Terror in Afghanistan Essay)
“The American War on Terror in Afghanistan Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/391500-case-study-on-the-american-war-on-terror-in-afghanistan.
Cited: 0 times
In the paper “The American War on Terror in Afghanistan” the author analyzes America’s war on terror, which has raised many concerns in America about the outcome of it. The US have already opened two war fronts; one in Iraq and another in Afghanistan…
The “War on Terror” is a blanket cause that allows the United States to intervene on any activities it considers to be terrorism. The war is fighting a faceless enemy, therefore it could be anyone. President Obama has chosen to withdrawal troops as well as focus on humanitarian aid.
George W. Bush and his supporters insist on the importance of fighting terror with war. Bush decided to deploy military force, uphold democracy in the Middle East. Bush offered liberal wartime powers to the commander in chief. Critics of Bush, however, questioned the usefulness of ‘war on terror’.
This was the day America would never forget and forgive. America realized the gravity of terrorism and the situation for the first time what most nations face on daily basis worldwide. It was also not a welcome fact that post 9/11 we discovered that the terrorist outfits which attacked us were actually trained by us.
US foreign policy has been drifting away from multilateral institutions policy to unilateral policy. This is inspite of Clinton’s call for engagement with the international community. The depth of Clinton’s downfall in foreign policy was demonstrated by the senate’s rejection of Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was meant to control arms.
Americans truly understand that the question concerning Afghanistan is not about winning the war but whether it leads to national security. The Obama administration should speed up troop withdrawal and turn over combat to the Afghan Army.
The War on Terror initiated by the U.S. and its allied nations plays the most important role in reducing the influence of terrorist organizations. To be specific, the War on Terror never ends because the influence of terrorism based on religious fundamentalism is powerful enough to challenge democracy.
The war on terror is going on thereby making the political grounds of the country vulnerable day by day and making more and more people psychologically weak. It seems as if both, 'war' and 'war on terror' has given nothing to the people but fear and anxiety to survive.
They are responsible for determining what it considers necessary in a particular circumstance. In the American-European relationship a fundamentally important ingredient continues to be missing: Europe. There is no Europe as such that is joining America in its long-term campaign; individual European states are doing what they can.
The effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York, which resulted in more than 3,000 innocent people killed spread human misery further than those persons affected directly by the loss of lives. The U.S. economy was held
Due to this key position in the war scenario, the magnitude of losses, as compared to other participating nations of the world, was far greater for the US.
The writer is of the opinion that the outcomes of
1 pages (250 words)Case Study
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The American War on Terror in Afghanistan for FREE!