In fact, the transitions went on smoothly, the listeners were not at all bored with the speech but were engaged with the speaker as evidenced by their reactions such as raising of hands and laughter. Hancock is obviously a seasoned speaker who is focused and meticulous in his explanations yet remains to be concise. This is very evident in his speech and he even ended with a very simple but powerful message about choosing what kind of record the listeners want to leave.Hancock’s delivery of his speech was very spontaneous and well-documented that he looked highly credible. He mentioned about his former job as a Customs Officer for Canada in the mid-1990s which awed the audience. This fact placed him in a higher pedestal that increased his credibility not only as a speaker but as an individual and an authority who knows what he is talking about. He appeared professional and confident because was dressed well and he stood and expressed his thoughts in an educated manner. The speaker’s best contributing factor to a successful speech is his spontaneity. The quality of his voice is fair but he could perhaps work more on it to become a more interesting speaker. His gestures are complimentary with his facial expressions, tone of voice as well as the topic he is discussing. However, his frequent walking from side to side seemed to have been overdone it was quite irritating. Perhaps, the speaker can practice more on his stance and frequency of shifting positions, choreographed in such a manner.
Cite this document
(“Speech Analysis on Jeff Hancock Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/553543-speech-analysis-on-jeff-hancock
(Speech Analysis on Jeff Hancock Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Speech Analysis on Jeff Hancock Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/553543-speech-analysis-on-jeff-hancock.
Cited: 0 times
In the paper “Speech Analysis on Jeff Hancock” the author analyzes Jeff Hancock’s speech “Three Types of Lies”, where he spoke very spontaneously. He used a combination of statistical results of researches, personal stories…
Hillary Clinton gave a speech in 2008 at Democratic National Convention and her style of speech would be analyzed on the basis of that speech. This speech was chosen to be analyzed because it is persuasive in nature. A persuasive speech requires comprehensive detail because the speaker needs to sell his opinion to the listeners.
It is silence that isolates.1” however, for effective public speaking one requires more than mere words. Not only is the choice of words important in a public speech, but the way in which they are spoken is a factor that weighs in to the whole
As a result, he asks the congress to pass bills which will favor employment of workers for facilitating these companies. Hence, there is need to construct new construction companies which will employ engineers, carpenters and plumbers,
Over the past fifteen days, I have been going through a rigorous transformation in public speaking. I have developed progressively in several sections of public speaking such as in presentation of the purpose and topic, presentation of logistics and occasion and in
Senator Marco Rubio introduced mitt Romney. Mitt Romney gave his speech at 10:33 P.M, as the last installment of the speeches. This paper seeks to present an analysis of the speech given by Mitt Romney during his nomination acceptance speech at
This paper aims to analyze and discuss, among other things, the organization and delivery mechanisms evident in a speech by Jeff Hancock on TED talks.
Jeff Hancock’s speech has a definite organizational