This essay stresses that Blair has one over Thatcher, however his success in the unification front was overshadowed by his allowing America to influence his decisions; during the George Bush Rein he was popularly parodied and his poodle and this despite the artistic harshness was not altogether unwarranted. Blair’s relations with his European counterparts were soured by his closeness with the US which negatively influenced relationships with the then French incumbent Jacques Chirac. One of the biggest failures of the Bush administration is considered to be the Iraq war which in the eyes of most people was seen as unnecessary and unjustifiable. Blair shared in this failure because he acting on fabricated information and ignoring intelligence reports he insisted that the British support the US in the war.
This paper makes a conclusion that despite their similarities, Thatcher stands above Blair in as far as global affairs were concerned primarily because she was more decisive and aggressive while Blair tended to be easily influence by external and internal factors. In addition, Thatcher’s tenure came shortly after the cold war and as the leader of Britain; she was highly influential in the restructuring that followed the institution of a new balance of power. Ultimately, while being cognisant of their individual personalities and leadership style, Thatcher period in power embodies far more influence and forcefulness of the British will on the world than Blair’s ever did.