Through their ability to foretell the consequences of their actions, they should come to an agreement, which is letting the biological parents have custody of their daughter. If the child’s biological parents are eventually given custody, it would be in the best interest of the majority. This is because the foster parents will finally accept the fact that they are rehabilitated and no longer have drug problems. That will also provide the best opportunity for the foster parents to explain to the child what happened and also enable them to become part of the reunited family by helping the child accept her parents. According to Ruggiero (2012), ethical decisions are influenced by, among others, family, feelings and majority view. Therefore, it is true that the child only knows of her foster family, but it is their obligation to help her accept her biological and true family. If the court opined that the biological parents were rehabilitated enough, then the foster parents should also feel the same and help them along. The ultimate result is that both families will end up being happy and the child will have a greater number of people she can trust and look up to.
Using the care-based thinking, Ruggiero (2012) opines that people should base their decisions on what they would want others to do to them. The biological parents, therefore, want their daughter back and care for her because they will most certainly need her care in old age. The foster parents ought to think in the same way and acknowledge that even they themselves would need a child’s care n future. Therefore, they should accept the court ruling and let the biological parents take care of their daughter. This school of thought is similar to the ends-based thinking in the sense that they both consider the ultimate outcome of one’s actions. However, they differ because the significance of response is emphasized in the ethics-based thinking. On the other hand, both schools of thought are