Parents-Children Dilemma Discussion - Essay Example

Through their ability to foretell the consequences of their actions, they should come to an agreement, which is letting the biological parents have custody of their daughter. If the child’s biological parents are eventually given custody, it would be in the best interest of the majority. This is because the foster parents will finally accept the fact that they are rehabilitated and no longer have drug problems. That will also provide the best opportunity for the foster parents to explain to the child what happened and also enable them to become part of the reunited family by helping the child accept her parents. According to Ruggiero (2012), ethical decisions are influenced by, among others, family, feelings, and majority views. Therefore, it is true that the child only knows of her foster family, but they must help her accept her biological and true family. If the court opined that the biological parents were rehabilitated enough, then the foster parents should also feel the same and help them along. The ultimate result is that both families will end up being happy and the child will have a greater number of people she can trust and look up to.

Using care-based thinking, Ruggiero (2012) opines that people should base their decisions on what they would want others to do to them. The biological parents, therefore, want their daughter back and care for her because they will most certainly need her care in old age. The foster parents ought to think in the same way and acknowledge that even they would need a child’s care in the future. Therefore, they should accept the court ruling and let the biological parents take care of their daughter. This school of thought is similar to ends-based thinking in the sense that they both consider the outcome of one’s actions. However, they differ because the significance of response is emphasized in ethics-based thinking. On the other hand, both schools of thought are worthy to be used in real-life dilemmas because real life considers results. Then, in a world that is engulfed in religion, it can be stated that every human would want others to do to them as they do unto them, hence, bringing out the relevance of care-based thinking. Aristotle would approve of the above solutions because, ultimately, they are in pursuit of happiness. Further, the solutions do not compromise the accomplishment of other higher goals but are, rather, in the sole pursuit of happiness.