This means anti-isms clearly pinpoint an enemy. Such groups with such ways of thinking strengthen cohesion in a procedure created in early Europe and spread to early United States.
Hatred dictates rightwing radicalism and extremists do not just love together with hate. One method of dealing with this way of thinking is acknowledging that terrorists as the “other group.” Such labeling is convenient for radicals because it enables them to overlook the truth that all traditions and faiths can manifest hatred (White, 2001). At the same time, all traditions and faiths are capable of turning into terrorist groups, including Western Christianity. This approach is evidence that researcher White marked the significance of building an adequately critical injustice to keep on pursuing the road to violence. Clearly, mixing an eschatological aspect to the extremist’ mentality increases the danger they pose substantially (White, 2001). People frequently dedicate to and value radical behavior because they are consistent with wider myths or frameworks of