The invasion continued when Israel invaded Iraq in 1981 terming it as “Operation Opera” attach saw Israel destroy nuclear reactors (Shipley 17). Failures from the diplomatic setup and unsuccessful consultations from the military led Israel to attack the Iraqi reactor. The nuclear program setup in Iraq commenced in 1960s, but it did not grow because of the lacing plutonium production (Shipley 17). It was to purchase it from France; but France turned down the purchase offer, settling for the building of laboratories and reactors used for research. Iran’s capability of creating nuclear weapon increased with the support from France. Iraq, given a nuclear weapon, gives other security structures threats of increasing security measures in the Middle East. The Middle East provides a nuclearized political environment that is molded with intricate influences. “Operation Opera” structured by Israel triggered increased political temperatures in the Middle East. Countries such as Syria increased their capabilities of securing nuclear weapons. Pre-emptive military action on nuclear infrastructure offers instability in a region.
The results of the “Operation Opera” grew years after its incursion. In 2003, the pre-emptive military action launched a military incursion against the controversial, but stable regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq (Shipley 17). After some resistance, the Israelites troops managed to beat the Iraqi troops and to oust the president. In the aftermath of the ouster of Saddam Hussein, many things that show that the attack should not have happened came out. America invaded Iraq with a primary aim of establishing its hegemony over the Middle East, but this has not been achieved; rather the invasion led to the destruction of Iraq as a unitary state, the growth of terrorism, loss of taxpayers’ money, loss of lives, and loss of its credibility in international affairs.
The invasion on Iraq by the United States has become a reference point of