It is evidently clear from the discussion that a rule utilitarian might assert that the best rule is one that favors shareholder interests in the long run which entails following government policies about emission levels because doing so protects the latter’s long-term interest. A company cannot exist and will not stay long without shareholders, so their happiness matters the most in this scenario. Furthermore, thinking about their interests can also satisfy the interests of workers for having lasting jobs, so this rule is not entirely bad for the interest of the many. However, shareholder happiness must not be based on temporary goal fulfillment but on long-term interests. John Stuart Mill asserts that the quality of happiness matters in making the right decisions. He believes that humans are rational creatures who use “higher faculties” and “nobler feelings” to make the best decisions for their happiness. This case demands high-level thinking about the long-term good of shareholders which includes not breaking laws. If the author will not publish the report and the environmental agency of the department finds out that the emission levels next year surpass the legal limits, the government will close factory operations which will detrimentally affect shareholders and employees alike. The decision to publish the report is important in ensuring that the company will follow policies on emissions levels and find the best technology to comply with them. A rule utilitarian might suggest going ahead and publishing the report so that the company can prepare for buying the latest technology, even if it is expensive because it will prevent future problems that will harm shareholder interest more.
Cite this document
(“Utilitarianism on Terminating Employees versus Truthful Environmental Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/697698-case-study-2
(Utilitarianism on Terminating Employees Versus Truthful Environmental Essay)
“Utilitarianism on Terminating Employees Versus Truthful Environmental Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/697698-case-study-2.
Cited: 0 times
This study presents an analytical criticism based on the comparison between utilitarianism on terminating employees and truthful environmental reporting.This paper illustrates that a rule utilitarian might advise to follow the rule of prioritizing the interests of shareholders…
The author examines motivation factors such as achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, advancement and growth since these factors have been established to increase human motivation, as well as the factors which are known to result in dissatisfaction. Researcher considers motivation as an important factor in employees’ institutions.
Social and Environmental reporting may be defined as the process of communicating social and environmental effects of the economic activities performed by an organisation to the various stakeholders of the company. Main reasons for social and environmental reporting – Stakeholder Theory SER provides information to the various stakeholders of the company regarding its operations.
This is a new field of accounting such that its focus is on how to measure the amount of investment the company has to put up in order to measure and communicate the costs from the company's use of raw materials and resources such as land, water, air and others.
The lack of the set of standards/guidelines in this regard compounded the intensity of the issue much better than ever before. . Big corporations prepare environmental reports on their own way as a ritual rather than a necessity. There have been also differences in the usage of reports by various stakeholders.
Utilitarianism is based on the “general happiness principle” or the “principle of utility” (PU). Actions are moral if they promote general happiness, and they are wrong if they will reduce general happiness. Among several actions, the right action promotes
These conditions cannot be considered wrong since it is natural for a human to be ambitious just to get what they want. Utilitarianism gives an avenue for an individual to use the resources around him to ensure that he or she will be happy. At the onset, there is nothing wrong about this ethically. However, put in the context of certain actions.
It is identified that the Utilitarian views are entirely different from its contemporary philosophical theories of morality. Under certain circumstances, even homicide is justifiable under Utilitarianism. This paper will discuss in what kinds of circumstances
t report their waste emission and energy utilization by following the stipulated legal framework for environmental reporting as well as incorporate various voluntary aspects of environmental reporting. An organization that measures and reports its environmental performance gains
8 pages (2000 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Utilitarianism on Terminating Employees versus Truthful Environmental Reporting for FREE!