[Ethics and Criminal Punishment] - Assignment Example

Discussion Post Discussion Post There is a major difference between retentionists and abolitionists in terms of capital punishments. Abolitionists consider that capital punishment should be practiced within every society. On the other hand, retentionists claim that capital punishment must be avoided in every possible manner. There are two different ethical systems that are followed by each school of thought in order to assert regarding capital punishment. These ethical systems include utilitarianism and non-consequentialist grounds of ethical theories (Frey, 2008).

Herein, it can be studied that the reason behind retentionists claim regarding capital punishment is that they believe that by banning it, more and more welfare can be increased within the society by large (Rosner, 2003). However, on the other hand, the abolitionist considers that there is an avid need of strict measures to be taken against the criminals because the rising percentage of corruption and crime in any society of the world is alarming. It is actually going to result in international criminal context.

Therefore, it is easier to note that both the school of thoughts is majorly different from each other on the basis of the ethical systems that they follow (MacKinnon & Fiala, 2015). Response to Classmate PostI would provide an agreement with the thoughts that have been well crafted in the post of my classmate. The aspect of re-integrative and integrative shaming remains very critical tool that has been used in the crime and justice department. Its significance has been well evaluated in the post as it is a theoretical body of concern.

References ListFrey, G. (2008). A Companion to Applied Ethics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.MacKinnon, B., & Fiala, A. (2015). Ethics: Theory and Contemporary Issues, Concise Edition. New York: Cengage Learning.Rosner, R. (2003). Principles and Practice of Forensic Psychiatry, 2Ed. Calfiornia: CRC Press.