However, they were disillusioned by the increased insecurity and instability of these states (Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Irag) as Irag revolted against British.
The states became disillusioned as Great Powers reneged on the earlier promises of creating independent states. “The political units created after WWI by imperial powers were not territories that were necessarily used to be governed as a single units (Walker, 2003; Kelidar 1993).” The treaty divided the Middle East into two; British and French mandated territories. There was no independence for the created states and had to be ruled by French and British while they had to start from scratch. Their own people and rulers rejected the states that had no structured political bases despite being portioned into political units. Discontents escalated leading to increased instability and insecurity within these States that saw Irag revolution against the British. The created states face difficulty in to design a framework that can amicably solve domestic political wrangles (Kelidar, 1993, p.
Cite this document
(“The Making of the Modern Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/709536-the-making-of-the-modern-middle-east
(The Making of the Modern Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“The Making of the Modern Middle East Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/709536-the-making-of-the-modern-middle-east.
Cited: 0 times
The major beneficiaries were the Great Powers (British and French) that got mandated by league of nation to take the territories after peaceful treaty of 1920 that forced Ottoman to sign it unconditionally surrendering. “The peace treaty served the great powers well but…
This study examines the issue in the light of the theoretical perspectives relative to politics in the Middle East. The theories that appear to provide an understanding and to explain the events of the conflict are neo-realism, modernization theory and post colonialism theory. However, the reasons behind the Oslo failure are best explained by the neorealist theory.
According to the report the Middle East was no less affected by the war. The Otto man Empire collapsed after ruling continuously for four consecutive centuries. The result of the collapse was a vacuum, which contributed to tension between external power or interests and local inhabitants. The struggle “war to end all war” had proved futile.
In the past, many communities institutionally acknowledged slavery however; currently slavery has been outlawed in many of these societies although it continues via practices of indentured servitude, serfdom, debt bondage and domestic servants kept as captives.
Even though the idea had been floating around for almost a thousand years increasing anti-Semitism in Europe during the later part of 19th century gave it a certain level of urgency which had previously been lacking. An example of this anti-Semitism was the Dreyfuss affair in France and more seriously the instigation of anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire (Sachar, 1979).
13). Even though Muslims had quite unique such as territorial, linguistic and ethnic differences that existed among them, they did not divide themselves along the lines of these differences. They considered themselves to be a unified region under one political umbrella.
This problem is analyzed and presented with zest and reason. The book presents these problems adequately and explains the origins of the problems and how they got developed though it does not look at providing any solution for the issues.
The author of the book is a journalist and has been a resident of the Middle East, able to speak Arabic fluently; was instrumental in reporting back to UK some of the major happenings in the history of that region; including Armenian Holocaust and the Iraqi war.
It starts with the dominance of Egypt in yesteryears on the Middle East and discusses Western influence. Then the consequence that resulted in the formation of the Jewish state, as well as Jewish nationalism, can be seen with simultaneous discussion of struggle between both types of nationalisms as well as nations.
While history is filled with plethora of Western culture documenting assimilation from the Western point of view, very few evidences are available which present the East peoples point of view of adaptation. As a
rtant economic theories that support or challenge the importance of globalisation for economic sustainability were explored, specifically as they relate to the economic development and political sovereignty of the Middle East. This theoretical discussion of economic growth,
The research will involve an exploration of the notion that economic sustainability of the Middle Eastern region in the 21st century requires full participation in the global financial and industrial markets as well as the potential effects of these economic trends on political and economic sovereignty in this region.
1 pages (750 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Making of the Modern Middle East for FREE!