However, this assertion is contested. This is because at the time of the revolution, Iran was experiencing un-employment rate of approximately 30%1. Unemployment is one of the indicators of poor development and economic growth. Based on this fact, the assertion that Iran was politically and economically stable is false, and does not hold any ground.
On the other hand, the revolution in Egypt occurred when the country was experiencing a series of poor political and economic governance. Despite the differences in these revolutions, and the two leaders, Gamal Abdul Nasser and Ayatollah Khomeini shared a lot of similarities as well as differences in their leadership structure and system2. One major similarity is that the two leaders were charismatic, and they sought to eliminate any form of opposition to their leadership. For instance, Nasser ordered a crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that was opposing his leadership, while Ayatollah Khomeini sought to kill any political supporters of the Shah. This paper takes a stand that both Ayatollah Khomeini and Gamal Abdul-Nasser were charismatic leaders, who influenced their societies and people, despite their undemocratic systems of governance.
Gamal Abdul Nasser was the second Egyptian president, and he began his presidency in the year 1956, to the time he died, which was in 1970. He played an instrumental role in the overthrow of the Egyptian monarch in the year 1952, and as a result, he was rewarded with a post, as a deputy prime minister3. This is an indication that Gamal Abdul Nasser was an important leader to the revolutionaries, and he was held in high esteem. Furthermore, the power and authority that Gamal Abdul Nasser had is depicted when he managed to arrest President Muhammad Naguib, and place him under house arrest.
Cite this document
(“Ayatollah Khomeini and Gamal Abdul-Nasser Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/713171-middle-east
(Ayatollah Khomeini and Gamal Abdul-Nasser Essay)
“Ayatollah Khomeini and Gamal Abdul-Nasser Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/713171-middle-east.
Cited: 0 times
This paper “Ayatollah Khomeini and Gamal Abdul-Nasser” takes a stand that both Ayatollah Khomeini and Gamal Abdul-Nasser were charismatic leaders, who influenced their societies and people, despite their undemocratic systems of governance…
Nasser's hometown of Beni Mur in Asyut district lacked distinction and could have been mistaken for any of the hundreds of mid-size villages in lower Egypt or "Said" as Egyptians call that part of the country. Beni Mur was where his family came from but Nasser was not born there.
He got educated at home and at the local school the supervision of Mullah Abdul-Qaasim and Shaykh Jaafar. Khomeini commenced his studies in Arak during the year 1921 and took up the residence at the Dar-al-Shafa school in Qom upon the invitation of Ayatullah Shaykh Abdul-Karim Haeri-Yazdi.
True, in the past, "strong men" --such as Mohamed Ali, dictator of Egypt for over forty years, and Khedive Ismail--have imposed their will on Egypt. When they passed from the stage, however, their accomplishments were dissipated by the ineptness of their successors and by the apathy of Egypt's ruling classes.
The author explains that Reza Pahlavi and Ayatollah Khomeini have written their name down in the history of Iran as very prominent people. And they will be remembered in good words and bad for a very long time. The United States and Britain have been greatly involved in the revolutions and coups carried out in Iran.
had been the top scientist in Pakistan and dealt with scientific programmes, until 2004, when the U.S government provided evidence on his suspicious activities of selling of illegal materials (Khan, 2010). The Court summoned Khan for debriefing but he denied the accusations. In
The unique combination of three elements of governance all seems possible and workable in his context. These are feudalism, communism and democracy. In the writers mind and in his interaction with various
Some of the reasons I gathered is that the citizens view you as a dictator as have been presidents before you and they are tired of the rule of absolute monarchy with presidential seat being inherited. Furthermore, the
However, we should embrace the socialist behavior where we promote the social welfare of the community as a whole. The little we have should be distributed to all so that we provide equality to all members of the society.
For companies, they are useful tools and techniques that minimize expenses and increase productivity. They help businesses to access new and wider markets. The computer industry greatly benefits from ISO since computer hardware and software use