Judges in this case stay objective, and listen keenly to what lawyers are advocating in a skilled manner ignoring the original intention of the legislation.
The above statement, its backed by several arguments as enhanced by the proponents of a “Living Constitution” against the Öriginalists”. Those who believe in the Constitution’s adaptability, argue that judges cannot rely on historical analyses to provide critical answers to the modern situations. In this case, its means that judges in any given situation must seek to apply the values of the Constitution in respect to the modern developments and not based on the original intentions of the legislation. Judges must be able to come up with their own outcomes, which are guided by values of fairness in uplifting the will of the people. Since it’s hard to tell what the framers of the constitution intended to achieve or what the people at that time of framing understood, interpreting the constitution to fit the modern circumstances it’s in order for the