News such as “a girl was raped by two drunk guys” (Almasy) or “car crashed with two drunk teenage drivers inside” (Taylor) are horrible to hear about. It is such accidents that help us rethink the advantages and disadvantages of the alcohol consumption underage. According to a lot of people, the age limit can help reduce life-threatening risks and binge drinking that could cause a threatening problem for the young generation. On the other hand, a lot of people believe that drinking risks are more related to personal choices than age limits, therefore the law must be changed. According to the essays by Chafetz and Toomey, there was a similar discussion on these topics, each expressing his own verdict about the drinking age and whether it should be reduced to eighteen from twenty-one or not. Toomey is in the favor for the legal age limit, while Chafetz is against the law. According to Toomey, the age limit helps define a limitation on the alcohol consumption and this effective law enforcement can help reduce the cases of drunk accidents and binge-drinking cases. Toomey intelligently uses statistical data, scientific researches and international studies to support his point of view. He also uses statistics about the world-wide age limits on consumption of alcohol and how this can be used for improvement within the United States. Chafetz on the other hand, emphasizes on the eradication of the age limit of twenty one years, and calls the reduction more effective and reasonable option.
Cite this document
(“Legal Drinking Age Has No Effect Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/748673-analytical-essay
(Legal Drinking Age Has No Effect Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Legal Drinking Age Has No Effect Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/748673-analytical-essay.
Cited: 0 times
In the paper “Legal Drinking Age Has No Effect” the author discusses the drinking, which depends more on self-control than age limit. The age limit can help reduce life-threatening risks and binge drinking that could cause a threatening problem…
The age 21 law is the reason why fewer car accidents due to alcoholic influence occur in America as compared to the European world. While it is claimed that MLDA should not be set at 18 because such action could greatly aggravate the harmful consequences for the society, the opponents of the age 21 law argue that a higher MLDA is only empty mockery because not only it is not associated with a decreased number of highway care accidents and reckless endangerment incidents involving the youth, but also it encourages the immature youngsters to pursue wrong paths to do exactly what they are stopped from by the law.
This paper illustrates that today alcohol is readily available and aggressively promoted in the USA. The minimum drinking age still continues to stir controversy with recent proposals to reduce the minimum age for drinking. Yet, the preponderance of evidence indicates that underage drinking is dangerous, not only for the drinker but also for society.
From this paper, it is clear that both the essays are authored by writers with impeccable credentials. Chafetz’s credentials are more than matched by Nelson and Toomey, who belong to the University of Minnesota’s School of Public Health. The reputation of the writers contributes to the trustworthiness of the essays and makes them both credible.
Binging generally starts as an unconscious act to do something different and perceived as "fun". Curiosity or boredom could lead teenagers and young adults to experiment with alcohol. Slowly, the same could become a habit and an obsession. Social drinking could also be one of the triggers for binge drinking.
The advocates of such a move argue that people who are allowed to vote and fight for the country at the age of eighteen need to be permitted to enjoy a beer or two at this age. The proponents of lowering the drinking age place their strong arguments in the most persuasive manner while the opponents of this view have their strong arguments ready to attack such a view in favour of lowering the drinking age.
.."unique" stance on it. When you're 18, you're still not "adult enough" to drink, although you are old enough to smoke yourself to death. I also believe that the drinking age should be raised to 21, just as many believe the drinking age is just fine where it is.
t is observed that adolescent people’s consumption of alcohol early in life and their accessibility to alcohol at home significantly relate to increased alcoholic drinking habits affecting social behaviors in the future. These results suggest reinforcements for potential
The drinking age should therefore be lowered to 18. Banning drinking age at 18 will not stop teenagers from drinking. It is also more dangerous when teenagers hide when they are drinking and 18 years old