Unacceptable governance - Research Paper Example

Unacceptable governance IntroductionBeing the most persuasive, category arguments feature in position papers and essays. The comprehensive argument has at least five parts, the introduction, the narration, the confirmation, the refutation and the conclusion. The arrangements on the part of the argument are logical so as ease the transition in thought.Claim:Colonists focus on unacceptable governance goes/does not go into the category of governed focus on unacceptable governance because it has / does not have the criteria of colonists focus on unacceptable governance:1.

He refuses to assent to laws.2. He forbids his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance.3. He refuses to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people.4. He calls together a legislative body at unusual, uncomfortable, and distant places in order to fatigue members and make them comply with his measures.5. He repeatedly dissolves representative houses for firmly opposing his invasions on people’s right.A colonist of destructive government has those criteria.1. He refuses to assent to laws.

The head of state has to assent to laws. The laws are necessary for public good.The King of Great BritainIn many circumstances refused to assent to laws.“He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.”2. He forbids his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance.A head of state must encourage governors to pass important laws.The king of Great BritainDuring governors meetings, he has always forbidden governors to pass laws.“He has made it inadmissible for his Governors to legislate on delicate issues unless he assents to it, and even when he permits, he neglects them.”3. He refuses to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people.

A good government must derive its powers from the consent of the governed.The King of Great BritainMany people allege that The King of Great Britain passed laws for his own interest.“He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of districts with high populations unless the populations would not a representation in the Legislature, a right unfathomable to them and only suitable to tyrants.”4. He calls together a legislative body at unusual, uncomfortable, and distant places in order to fatigue members and make them comply with his measures.

A common comfortable meeting place for legislators symbolizes good government.The King of Great BritainLiterature provides enough evidence of the King calling meetings at remote places.“He has assembled legislative bodies surprisingly at unusual places, deplorable, and away from reach to their documented public Records, with the aim of tiring them into complying with his stringent measures.”5. He repeatedly dissolves representative houses for firmly opposing his invasions on people’s right.

A responsible government permits different views from the house representatives.The King of Great BritainThe king dissolved several houses on opposing his peoples’ right invasions.“He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.”ConclusionCategory argument has a criteria match structure. The criteria section illustrates and explains the criteria while the match section persuades the reader that the example meets the criteria.

An example of category argument is Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence. There are three criteria used and several points to match the criteria. The importance of category arguments is that it acknowledges and builds on distinction in theories of coordination, binding and discontinuities.Works citedThe Declaration of Independence http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htmFlateby, Teresa L. Improving Writing and Thinking Through Assessment. Charlotte, N.C: Information Age Pub.

Inc, 2011. Print.