This discussion stresses that the dependency theory refers to the model explaining the notion of flow of resources. According to this theory, resources flow from the boundary or the periphery of the undeveloped and poor countries to the center of the economically stable or the wealthy states enriching the developed countries at the expense of the weak states. Whereas the dependency theory originates from third world countries to explain the fate they suffer in the hands of the developed countries, Smith describes the neoliberalists as people from the economically stable nations concerned with the modern political economy. Neoliberalism refers to the modern political, the economic theory that favors free trade. Hays and David describe neoliberalism to favors the privatization of public organization with minimum government intervention in the commercial business. It is seen to advocates for a decrease in public expenditure on social services, On the other hand, is from the third world countries, the dependency theory assumptions are based on these nations. They hold that countries that are more developed should play a part in improvising those countries that lie below in development. Their assumptions, therefore, focus on the capitalist approaches to break the development of these countries. Besides this theory hold a view of underdevelopment rather as a process as compared is to a stage. For these countries, under development forms a process to reach a full developmental goal or a full potential. Finally, the theorist holds that significant influence to the third world countries is by financial aid and subsidiaries. However, they not that foreign aid is never free rather it has some attached strings. This foreign aid most of the time form a debt trap for the developing countries.
Cite this document
(“Compare and Contrast Dependency Theory and Neoliberalism Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/780111-compare-and-contrast-dependency-theory-and-neoliberalism
(Compare and Contrast Dependency Theory and Neoliberalism Essay)
“Compare and Contrast Dependency Theory and Neoliberalism Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/780111-compare-and-contrast-dependency-theory-and-neoliberalism.
Cited: 0 times
This paper, Compare and Contrast Dependency Theory and Neoliberalism, stresses that the role of the neoliberals and dependency theories in the international relations and economic activities is significant. Borrowing from the fastness of their assumptions, these principles are applicable…
Consequences of Neoliberalism.
Neoliberalism refers to a market-driven approach to the policy making process for running economy and society (Campbell and Pedersen, 2001, p3). The approach basically stems from the neoclassical theories of economics focusing upon the efficient role of the private enterprises, trade liberalization and establishment of open markets.
Moreover, these are systemic as they underlie both the policies and practices of institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Both of which are powerful institutions facilitating globalization. Further, as structural, it will be argued using a Marxian analysis that always where capitalism is, so to is the division of labour between those who own their own means of production and those who have to sell their labour in order to subsist.
World Politics, Power and Ethics: Conflicting realities, contrasting theories. List of Questions: 1. Compare and contrast the assumptions about international phenomena made by Liberalism and Realism. What assumptions about the nature of world politics are advanced by each tradition?
Neoliberalism refers to the assumption that government intervention is unnecessary as the market is capable of taking care of itself (Erickson et al. 264). Meanwhile, centrist strategy pertains to limited liberty to compete in the market and minimal government intervention (Samuelson 33).
The proof of this idea is in globalization, which has become a system through which the world has now been seen to be a global village whereby each nation depends on the other for one form of development or the other. It is in the need for each nation to be its other’s keeper that brought the search for various forms of political and socio-economic theories that could best serve the interest of all sides involved, namely the developed world and the developing world.
The biological metaphor was transferred to the social sciences: societies, political institutions, economies were deemed to be growing organisms progressing according to an order natural to them. That is, the development of elements of social life was naturalised: made to appear as if development (as opposed to constant change) is directional, following a path of ever-near perfection".