Through these interactions, the society can authoritatively allocate values (Easton, Gunnell & Stein 1995). In short, it is a systematic way used to determine the allocation or power and authority in the society.
The term system reflects brings together various elements as captured by Easton. These elements include the purpose of the system. In this case, the main objective of a political system should be to convert inputs, which exist in the form of demands from supporters and converting them into decisions. Secondly, a political system should consist of elements (Barrington 2012). These elements consist of decisions, demands, implementations, strategies among others. Thirdly, it is necessary to have boundaries that define the political system. These boundaries play a critical role when it comes to determining what belongs to the system of not (Almond 1988). Lastly, the environment is a major player in a political system. In this case, actions considered to be lacking in political will, exist in the environment.
Easton introduces three different levels in a political system. These levels include the state, the regime, and the government. According to the political systems theory, the state represents an institution that bears that responsibility to govern. It is a legitimate entity that exists permanently. A regime represents fundamental rules and principles (Frohock 1974). It is an organization of power in a specific government. Thirdly, the government refers to a collection of existing offices that exist in a political system. These offices give the office holders room to act on behalf of the people in realizing their objectives.
Easton’s political system represents a systematic approach when it comes to politics and governance. In essence, it makes it possible to analyze political systems and come up with solutions to some of the challenges facing the society. Easton developed a systematic process of transforming input into output. Through