Ethical interview - Coursework Example

Ethical Interview Insert Insert What is your philosophy on this matter? According to the perceptional philosophy behind this harvesting of embryo and freezing, in many healthcare dilemmas, a technology can be used to create life following the death of the male parent. Despite those children being born healthy and sound mind, my question is, will they be given social security benefits of the deceased parent? The article is emphasizing that embryo harnessing and generic manipulation is used in those instances where one of the parents leaves the earth untimely.

On the other hand, most couples have this assisted reproductive technology to have children for a quiet period. From this illustration, it is evident that this method is not only used the moment a partner dies (Garcia, 2001). From the matter and hand, Karen Capato who used has husbands through the Vitro fertilization gave a result of twins. It is a fact that some children have been denied a right of accessing the heritage on how they were born. The governing bodies have to propose a bill that advocates genetically manipulated children to find and understand how they came into existence and to gain their inheritance.

The attitude and the perception by the state not to recognize these children as humans even though they are issued with the birth certificates is an overwhelming factor that needs to be eliminated. Despite technology being used, what matters is that the result that will be generated is a human being. Putting these children in the state of doubt makes them lose confident of themselves being in mind their conception was as natural as compared to the other kids (Salumets, 2003). 2) What is your worldview on this matter?

Globally, the matter grown to a higher level because the number of children produced with the assistance of technology has continued to grow. Its growth has gotten a bigger number of complex ethical issues especially those that are associated with the matter at hand. When it comes to the social security benefits entitlement for these children conceived through means, I suggest that there should be some limits in the decision that are proposed by the supreme courts. For the limit to be implemented there must be considerations and according to my opinion, I suggest this by the use of utilitarian ethical theory and the principle of fairness (SANKAI, 2000).

When children are conceived using genetic manipulation, there are legal difficulties that that compounds the individual to gain the inheritance. Through applying the principle of justice, we focus on the equitability of the distributional risks because of the limited resources available. The limit of the children through this technology helps those who lost their parent to acquire a continued availability of the resources through financial support. Some other legal aspects of the discussion need to be involved.

These issues are requiring the owner of the embryo, inheritance rights of the children and the third party. To the authorities, the child that is conceived under genetic manipulation or embryo harvesting must be given protection under the law and be given the same rights the same as the child born to living parents (Garcia, 2001). ReferencesGarcia, J. (2001). Practical considerations of embryo manipulation: preimplantation genetic typing. Theriogenology, 56(9), 1393-1399. doi:10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00642-2Salumets, A. (2003). Effect of developmental stage of embryo at freezing on pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Human Reproduction, 18(9), 1890-1895. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg339SSANKAI, T. (2000). In Vitro Manipulation of Nonhuman Primate Gametes for Embryo Production and Embryo Transfer. Exp. Anim., 49(2), 69-81. doi:10.1538/expanim.49.69