Gladys argument focuses on the fact that democracies cannot wage successful wars as the case of Athenians waging war in Sicily’s. I do support her argument that democratic countries should distinguish between good and bad leaders, but I find certain flaws in her argument. I agree with Gladys’ premises that suggest the country frightened their generals into sending better news home than the facts on the ground and chose weak generals to wage the war. This argument leads to her argument that democracies cannot wage a successful war. A look at all the premises helps Gladys conclude that a democratic country cannot lead such a war is viable.Her argument in her conclusion is valid since there need to be better strategies in war, and the failure of Athenians was a result of poor strategies and poor execution by the generals. There was a need to evaluate leaders and have better alternatives. In her argument, it is clear that poor intelligence brought the wrong generals, and they were overextended. This situation showed that to have the best plans there is a need for good executors for it to be successful. In conclusion, I agree with her argument that democratic countries cannot wage successful war since their strategies are prone to hope and checks and balances. Such checks limit the passion experienced in such wars but to be on the safe side all parties in a war need to appreciate and differentiate between choosing weak and strong leaders to wage wars.
Cite this document
(“Democracy in Modern World Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/819920-freedom
(Democracy in Modern World Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Democracy in Modern World Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/819920-freedom.
Cited: 0 times
The present essay entitled "Democracy in Modern World" dwells on the idea of democracy. As the author puts it, Gladys argument focuses on the fact that democracies cannot wage successful wars as the case of Athenians waging war in Sicily’s. …
Democracy The word ‘Democracy’ is derived from the two Greek words ‘Demos’ and ‘Kratos’ which mean ‘People’ and ‘Rule’ respectively. So, it can be described as the rule of the people. According to Sir John Seeley, democracy can be defined as “a government in which everyone has a share”.
Robert Dahl, arguably the most influential American political scientist of the 20th century reckons that democracy is a utopian concept that is not found anywhere in contemporary geo-politics. In its stead, leading industrial societies of the world, including the United States have a ‘Plutocracy’, where power is shared and wielded by various major public institutions.
Before this initiative, the government was controlled by the selected group of people, autocrats. Since that time, the definition of democracy has much extended but the basic philosophy remained the same - insisting on the rights and capacity of people to control their governments for the social wellbeing.
These are mutually opposing political and economic theories involving every aspect of the modern human being and, therefore, require a meticulous examination and comprehension. In an attempt to distinguish among these philosophic concepts, an extensive and critical analysis of these in their perspectives on human nature, the state, international institutions and order vs.
Now they can leave home and be independent. These new independents may apply for a job and do what they had long wanted to do and buy what they had wanted to buy because their parents forbade them not to do or buy before.
Democracy can also be defined as the right to vote in any organization.
As is well known, "democracy" is taken from Greek word which means "government of the people, by the people and for the people." "demos" means people, and "cratos" means government. This is the meaning of the word (the nominal definition), but the concept to which the word corresponds (the real definition), has been evaluated or developed through history (De Torre, 1997).
To qualify as a democracy, a country must fulfil the following criteria:
Third world countries are those under developed countries where the realities of life for most people are hunger, acute poverty and unemployment, among a variety of other factors. This paper seeks to answer the question of whether or not democracy can survive in these third world countries.
Lord Bryce states that democracy is “the form of government in which the ruling power is vested not in a particular class but in all the persons of a state”. Abraham Lincoln defined it as “democracy is the government of the people, by the people and
Among the expected merits and therefore payoffs of democracy was that it establishes and protect the freedom of the people, in terms of individuality and as a nation. Democracy therefore gives the public a chance to participate as well as be represented in the
From a different angel of view, Islamic Law is limited to the context of Islamic Republics, and secular law is never accepted within this scenario. The immigrant Muslims in the modern societies claim that Islamic
8 pages (2000 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Democracy in Modern World for FREE!