Eristic dialogue covers argumentation, a social debate where victory over an antagonist is the primary goal. This art of right argument protects their self-interest incoherent dialogue and in the process of dialogue. The art of argumentation is used in law, in trials when preparing arguments for court presentation and in the testing legitimacy of evidence.Right argument comprises identifying premises where conclusions are derived, the establishment of “burden of proof” to determine the person who made an initial claim and identifying goals of contributors in dialogue. At the end of an argument, a valid conclusion must be given with good reason explaining the same. A good argument must be built with two premises and one concluding remark. Argumentation is good in a situation where evidence does not exist especially in handling scientific, epistemic, nature, and moral where science cannot apply. Violence is good in handling dispute like border disputes, insurgency, and hostility.In politics, some kinds of argumentation are morally wrong, and some kinds of violence are morally right. Argumentation is never a solution in many nations since it only works when there is peace in the nation, and no other nation wants to attack the nation in question. Argumentation is morally upright only if the nations under conflict also handle disputes through argumentation. If the nations under disagreement handle the dispute in different angles, then violence is morally right for a nation to defend itself from intrusion.
Cite this document
(“Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/social-science/824811-consensus-between-violence-and-argument
(Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Consensus Between Violence And Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/social-science/824811-consensus-between-violence-and-argument.
Cited: 0 times
The right argument is morally better than violence. The paper "Consensus Between Violence And Argument" discusses the thesis about that all conflicts should and must be settled in a peaceful way. It also gives information about the structure of right argument or argumentation…
Power and violence seem to have close relationships. It is difficult for a person to engage in violent activities without power. Hitler succeeded in killing thousands of Jews because of the power he had.
There are people who cannot utter the term without foaming at the mouth."(1).The phrase is taken "to refer to the lowest common denominator of policy advice being addressed by the Washington-based institutions to Latin American countries as of 1989." (2).Such policies often include-fiscal discipline; a reorientation of public expenditure priorities toward fields offering both high economic returns and targeting evener income distribution,.e.g.
Main objective of these reforms package and creation of international financial institutions was to revamp the failing economies of Latin America, Africa and south Asia in 1980s. Free market economy was supposed to give a strong boost to the economies in the developing world.
A number various alarming issues are emerging as warned by policymakers and scholars, due to this undesirable trend, such as the administrative chaos, unprecedented violence and health issues. Consequently, corresponding emergency measures have been taken, to cater these issues.
The media includes radio, television, the press, video, video games and even film. More often than not, given the nature of its activities, it finds itself displaying various forms of violence, Cantor J, (2000). There is a scientific consensus after thirty years of research that viewing of entertainment violence can lead to increases in aggressive behaviour, attitudes and values among people, especially children (Joint statement American Medical Association et al, 2000, July 26).
Teenage is a dangerous period of life. Teenagers are more volatile to dangerous things at this age because of their biological and psychological specialties at this stage. They will be infatuated to many things during this period and music like rap is one of them.
“Others” have become the means of unification. However, the attempt to create an American Identity based on equality, republicanism, and commercial capitalism has led to cultural and economic divisions. In addition, the
This research will begin with the statement that all the national leaders during the 21th century in the United States that is, Jefferson, Jackson, Herbert Hoover and Roosevelt who were Republicans, Democrats, conservatives or liberals were bounded by horizons of enterprise and property and accepted the economic qualities of the capitalistic culture as the necessary value of man.
5 pages (1250 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Consensus Between Violence And Argument for FREE!