Health care system entails an organized plan that links the agencies, facilities, and every other provider of health care in a given country. Recent literature has presented varied suggestions in trying to categorize the health care systems of countries. Health care systems are generally founded on specific political, historical, cultural and socio-economic traditions which make the organizational arrangements considerably different between countries, in this case Sweden and Germany. Each of the two systems attempts to address the citizens’ need for health and health however the extent to which the demand for health care appropriately reflects the actual population is an issue that arises. We cannot measure health in a direct way thus a variety of indicators for quantity and quality of health should comprise features of population and indicators of health such as life expectancy, morbidity and mortality. It is all under these criteria that cross-country comparison of healthcare systems of Sweden and Germany is carried out. The outline of health status indicators and outcomes can assist to approximate the quantity and quality of health care of Germans and Swedes. However, there is need to appreciate the fact that cross-country comparison of health care in the two countries is only applicable within the constraints of data availability and comparability. Healthcare System in Sweden The population of Sweden in 2011 was 9.4 million and has ranked above Germany in several key health indicators. It has consistently ranked at the top for nearly all health outcomes when compared to the German outcomes, with a particularly low infant mortality rate of three per 100,000 live births and a high life expectancy of 78 years for men and 82.8 years for women according to 2005 statistics (Anell, Glennga? and Merkur, 2012). Healthcare is seen as a fundamental element of the extensive Swedish welfare system where the whole population has access to a comprehensive variety of services and is covered by the National Insurance Scheme, funded mainly through employer contributions. The most outstanding feature of the healthcare system is the main role the twenty three county councils and the three municipal councils play. These councils majorly play a central role of ensuring that the system is efficiently planned, financed and delivered to the population of their respective territories. Inpatient care is approximately entirely funded by taxes collected by the country’s councils and delivered by hospitals that the councils run and own. The prominence of the Swedish healthcare system has long been on equity and has been rather successful in containing healthcare costs at a stable fraction of national GDP standing at 9.9% as at 2009 (Anell, Glennga? and Merkur, 2012). Sweden has been able to achieve these better-quality outcomes at a comparatively lower cost. According to statistical outcomes from 2002, Germany spends US$3635 per capita on health care whereas Sweden’s expenditure is lesser (US $2517) yet achieves vastly better health care. However, the system has faced some challenges that have affected its delivery of healthcare due to swindling financial resources. There have been oversupplies in hospital services caused mainly by the strong traditional emphasis on hospital care. The choices of patients are very limited and output and competence in healthcare delivery is a major focus for transformation. The provision of health care coverage in Sweden though universal, it is limited for residents to choose outside their registered counties when a referral is not needed. Within their own county council, citizens normally have the freedom to choice of where they wish to obtain
Cite this document
(“Health Care Systems: Cross-national Comparison Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/100476-1-give-a-comparative-cross-national-account-of-social-policy-in-one-of-the-following-policy-fields-health-care
(Health Care Systems: Cross-National Comparison Essay)
“Health Care Systems: Cross-National Comparison Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/100476-1-give-a-comparative-cross-national-account-of-social-policy-in-one-of-the-following-policy-fields-health-care.
Cited: 0 times
Health care systems are the most important cornerstones of welfare states and are designed with the aim of meeting an individual population’s health care needs including but not limited to prevention of disease, provision of diagnostic, curative, rehabilitative…
This paper brings to light the benefits to be accrued by the national health care reforms. It is necessary to state at the onset that national health care reforms would lead to the creation of wealth through increased productivity. Companies would also be required to contribute to the health of their staff thus the nation stands to gain from entrepreneurial rent.
The same report placed Singapore at top most position in the Asian Continent. Another Global Competitiveness Report of the year 2006-07 positioned Singapore at the top slot for infant mortality, eighth for life expectancy and at position nine for adult mortality rate (World Economic Forum, 2008:1).
There are various health care systems all over the world, with as many organizational structures and histories as there are countries. They include publicly funded health care, two-tier health care system, single-payer system, universal health care system, and socialized medicine system.
Health care is one of the biggest factors under this role.
A nations' health cannot be compromised by the wealth it has. Yet there are some rich countries that perform poorly when it comes to caring for its citizens' health. The United States was the largest spender in terms of health care with 15% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP).
At time of exigencies the health facilities are made available for free and the charges are paid by the money collected from general taxation. The World Health Organization ranked UK healthcare system as the 15th best in Europe and 18th across the world. (World Health Organization)
Factors have included more convenient services, to be considered as equal partners in the healing process, to be able to choose local sites for services, and to feel supported by the National Health System (NHS) to be well, remain out of hospital and independent.
The United States is well-known for their privatized health care. Is Canada to follow suit
In order to better regard this topic, a brief history of the implementation of the current Canadian health care system must be discussed. Further, appropriate financial matters should be considered.
The United States has a system of employment-based, voluntary insurance (62.6 %), social insurance and public programs and services. Rising costs of health care and insurance have impacted several components of the health care
The structural organization of an organization is the most important in the sense that it provides a basis for providing the necessary services to the people as appropriate. It is important to note that the healthcare
2 pages (500 words)Research Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Health Care Systems: Cross-national Comparison for FREE!