Comparison of the Social Sciences - Essay Example

? Comparison of the Social Sciences A Critical Comparison between the Human Behavior Disciplines of Anthropology, Psychology, and Sociology According to Turner (2009), anthropology, sociology, and psychology are learning, models, as well as concepts tangled in the assessment of human creatures. In most cases, personal studies of either topic intersect to some extent into one or the other, and as a consequence, they are referred to as the trios to the learning of people. Accordingly, to the inexperienced, social sciences may seem to be same, nevertheless, as a learner grows through their personal learning, they experience various models. These fresh models expose even extra chances to supplementary learning. Consequently, it occasionally becomes unclear as the why, for instance, the learner declaims and studies from an anthropologists literatures when they themselves are learning sociology. To elaborate further, a person must comprehend that, even though each of the sciences can and frequently do supplement each other, they are diverse sciences or disciplines in their own perspectives. According to Lewis (2004), sociology is the systematic and natal learning of cultures as well as societal associations. Its main objective is to provide sociologists an understanding into the behavior of human creatures. In addition, sociology explains how and why people act as a society, group, family, or religion member for an instance. Sociology deals with various questions ranging from why individuals fall in love, how early implementations happened among others. This thus illustrates that sociologists gathers bulks of information founded on comparative, evolving, as well as hypothetical queries. In comparative questions, they frequently associate social setting amid nations such as the variances in unlawful deeds and/ or policing. On the other hand, evolving queries design a direction from pre-existing nations to the current day, in order to learn the procedure of a particular theme, including the beginning of the welfare state. Accordingly, theoretical queries in others terms empirical queries have the tendency of asking questions concerning how and why things happen or take place. Empirical queries learn about models such as industrialization. Accordingly, somatic anthropology includes natural science, which is the learning of existing things. Accordingly, demographical is the learning of populace as a complete. In addition, social or cultural anthropology frequently referred to as sociocultural anthropology demonstrates about structures and cultures created by human creatures. Sociocultural anthropologists learn about various similar models and philosophers as academics of sociology. Nonetheless, sociocultural anthropology varies in approaches used, such as dialectology (languages); consequently is not alike to sociology (McCoy, M., et al., 2007). Similarly, psychology is the scientific study of Behaviour within humans and animals, focusing on models regarding human mental behavior. Psychologists deals with issues such as psychoanalysis which focuses on an individual`s sub-conscious yearnings and desires. It is thus believed that unconscious desires results into an individual`s unsteady or irrational or fixated deeds. There is also behaviorism as a section of psychology, which focuses on studying behavior. Researches involved in this, includes employing animals in experiments as a way of understanding learning through rewarding them for excellent conduct. In the social order, there is a stressing on the temperament. More outstandingly, it involves the way an individual views or perceives themselves through the eyes or before others, otherwise referred to as self-perception. Even though some sociology, anthropology and psychology disciplines can be valuable to each other, they are as far apart from each other as any scientific model, any scientific learning and any social scientist who learns them. However, it is also true that sociology and psychology are closely connected with each other; for instance, both are interconnected and inter-reliant. Psychology focuses on the assessment of the deepness of a human being`s mind and deeds in society. It is demonstrated that psychology displays the importance of the association amid humankind and environment as well as the reaction of the earlier to the final. It is the learning of an individual`s intellectual life and deed; it is the discipline of mind of mental developments. The objective of psychology is to achieve the laws of intellectual life and behavior of human kinds. On the other hand, sociology deals with society; meaning that it shows the social associations of individuals. In general, psychology is the practical subject of encounters of people and their conduct. Thus, sociology focuses on society where as psychology concentrates on human conduct (Kumar, 2006). Both are viewed as constructive science. These two subjects have a pronounced deal in common and are interconnected. It is challenging to comprehend the inter-connections and the actions of human beings; without a suitable understanding of human psychology. In similar way, numerous facts of psychology would stay incomprehensible without a all-inclusive knowledge about social relations, conduct and accomplishments. On the contrary, anthropology is concerned in the complete culture of a group of individuals. This comprises social organizations, art, antiquity, legends, and common customs, among other qualities. Anthropologies currently learn about the social order all over the world, but look for predominant subjects that are strengthened through case readings. It also comprises archeology, and because of a countless amount of practical assumption is thought to be a lenient discipline than sociology and psychology. In general, these three scholarships have certain dissimilarities. For instance, psychology is apprehensive with the human awareness whereas sociology focuses on humanity as a whole. However, anthropology is viewed to be a lenient discipline than sociology and psychology as it centers more of its suppositions on case studies than firm facts. Moreover, the approaches used by sociology, anthropology and psychology are not the same; this implies that both disciplines therefore, vary from each other in respect of approaches or systems used. Accordingly, the psychologist emphases his devotion on the individual while the sociologist is pre-occupied with humanity as a whole. Therefore, the discrete is viewed as the item of psychology and humankind is viewed as the portion of sociology. The Importance of Cultural Diversity From research, cultural diversity is the value of assorted or dissimilar cultures, as divergent to monocultures, as in the worldwide monoculture, or a homogenization of cultures, parallel to cultural deterioration (Geertz, 2003). This may also refer to having various diverse cultures reverence each other`s dissimilarities. Cultural diversity may also at times be employed imply the diversity of human values or cultures in a precise county, or in the world as a whole. The notion of cultural diversity has a very extensive range and is being experienced by individuals and institutions in the entire world. Generally, this notion involves staying with individuals of varied races, religions and enhancing the entrance of people from dissimilar nations. Despite the fact that this idea has attained impetus in the past few centuries, its presence is moderately long-standing and cultural diversity endures to live all around people. It subsists in diverse societies and families, from minor environs to large metropolises and that too throughout the world. Diversity is a component of the society and has currently become an imperative portion of companies as well. There are numerous importances or significances of cultural diversity and they include promoting values of humanity. This implies that once a country has a group of people coming from diverse cultures, it shows that the country identifies, rejoices, and honors the diversity that is in individuals of different upbringings. It makes the people of the country think that the society and the management comprehend their significance and well-intentioned influences. In addition, cultural diversity enhances productivity and profitability within a society or the country as a whole. Separately from these values of humanity, cultural diversity also conveys some perceptible profits to societies all over the world. Energetic influence of diversity at the in a country directly influences efficiency and effectiveness of the nation as well as the people within that society. There is an enrichment of efficiency of the people and usefulness for the country and the world as a whole. Moreover, cultural diversity assists to generate a group of ability or talent. For instance, when any country ventures in diversity, it leads in the establishment of a greater pool of ability. This is beneficial for community and the nation at large. This is because people interchange and acquire each other’s optimistic values and proficiencies. Such a pool of talent offers the country with a competitive advantage, which help it to advance in a vast and competitive atmosphere. Cultural diversity also leads to interchange of inventive concepts (UNESCO, 2002). When a society encompasses of individuals with varied experiences, principles and proficiencies, fresh resourceful and advanced philosophies come up in the attentions of diverse people. It is normal that individuals with variable capabilities and viewpoints in life would be capable to produce exclusive concepts and resolutions to complications. Such self-motivated interactions that take place between people having dissimilar discernments produce inventive outcomes. Such a condition is never generated in groups of people who think in the same way and belong to analogous cultures. In addition, cultural diversity develops channels of understanding which reduce probabilities of skirmishes among societies or world as a whole. This is because as people come together to share various ideas, they develop an environment of understanding and peace in order to come to a good conclusion (Harris, 2001). Creation peace thus leads to reduction of conflicts that may have grown up later. Furthermore, cultural diversity leads to deepened by experience to other devotions and principles, which could be of great significant to a society. It also leads to the improvement or establishment of a better understanding of human self-worth and multiplicity. As people learn to accept and respect other people`s cultures, there is high possibility or potential of comprehending their self-worth and multiplicity of inventive ideas. As it is in most cases, cultural diversity has the tendency to promote learning from other cultures in terms of their Faith, food and jubilees, as well as create a awareness into other means of living. Finally, cultural diversity may also lead to establishment of coordination. This happens when people afford to enjoy diverse cultures and belief. Therefore, cultural diversity is of very significance importance to the society and the world as a whole because of its numerous benefits that comes with it. The Values of Respect and Community for People of Other Cultures Relations are vital because they lead to change in communities. Therefore, establishing associations with individuals from various cultures most of the time is main way in developing diverse societies that are dynamic enough to accomplish significant objectives. In order to achieve this, it is important the people learn the values of respect to community and people of other cultures (Takaki, 2003). This could be through making a mindful choice to develop a relationship with individuals from other cultures. People should also consider circumstances where they will have to meet with individuals from other cultures, and be great listeners to others in order to show that their suggestions are respected at all levels. In conclusion, this research demonstrated that the discipline of anthropology, which offers all of the evidences of a culture, is founded upon culture, region, race, sexual category and culture. Psychology articulates that a person can employ the information from the field of anthropology theory, a psychological outline or the approach of a specific culture, race, region or tribal group to regulate what they will or will not do. Sociology articulates that grounded upon the discipline of anthropology and psychology, political front-runners, social organizations, industries, and others can regulate what social concepts or social foundations to use as a scheme for alteration. In addition, the study discoursed in facts certain significances of cultural diversity. For instance, it realized that cultural diversity enhances productivity and profitability within a society or the country as a whole. Separately from these values of humanity, cultural diversity also conveys some perceptible profits to societies all over the world. Energetic influence of diversity at the in a country directly influences efficiency and effectiveness of the nation as well as the people within that society. To sum it up, the research reflected upon the values of respect and community of other people`s cultures. References Geertz, C. (2003). The Interpretation of Cultures. American Journal, 100: 71-73. Harris, M. (2001). The rise of anthropological theory: a history of theories of culture. American Anthropologist, 100: 716-731. Kumar, R. (2006).Fundamentals of Sociology. New York,NY: Atlantic Publishers & Dist. Lewis, S. (2004) "Imagining Anthropology's History." Reviews in Anthropology, v. 33. McCoy, M., et al. (2007). Toward a more perfect union in an age of diversity: A guide for building stronger communities through public dialogue. Pomfret, CT: Topsfield Foundation. Takaki, R. (2003). A different mirror: A history of multicultural America. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Turner, R. (2009). Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives. California: Transaction Publishers. UNESCO. (2002). "UNESCO Universal Declaration On Cultural Diversity" . UNESCO Universal Declaration On Cultural Diversity UNESCO,Retrieved 24 July 2012. Read More